2006
DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e89-b.2.436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converter-Aware Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks with Limited-Range Conversion Capability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLR [15] tries to decrease blocking probability by minimizing the number of converters assigned to a lightpath. The FLR uses the concept of lambda-run.…”
Section: Flr (First Longest-lambda Run)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FLR [15] tries to decrease blocking probability by minimizing the number of converters assigned to a lightpath. The FLR uses the concept of lambda-run.…”
Section: Flr (First Longest-lambda Run)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a set of lambda-runs from the source to the destination is found, the lightpath is successfully set up, otherwise, blocked. In [15], it is proven that this simple policy leads to minimizing the number of wavelength conversions in setting up a lightpath.…”
Section: Flr (First Longest-lambda Run)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conversion between wavelengths can be achieved in different ways [16,17], but all these implementations are very costly. Furthermore, some WCs may only allow conversion between a limited range of wavelengths [18,19], increasing the complexity of routing and wavelength assignment [20,21]. Due to the high price of WCs, several studies focus on minimizing their deployment in a network, either through advanced routing and wavelength assignment heuristics or sharing schemes [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%