2014
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2014.2304412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Distributed Demand Management for Community Charging of PHEV/PEVs Based on KKT Conditions and Consensus Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Case 5.3 investigates the performance of the proposed strategy under the link/node failures. To accomplish the tractability of the demonstration, it is assumed that if the single-link/node failure occurs in the communication topology, the rest of the weighted-balanced digraph should still remain connected, and thus the remaining nodes would be able to operate with their neighbouring nodes continuously [43]. Finally, the scalability analysis is validated in Case 5.4 in the IEEE 162-bus system with various RGs and ESSs, such as WTs, PVs, Solar thermal, BESSs and fuel cells.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 5.3 investigates the performance of the proposed strategy under the link/node failures. To accomplish the tractability of the demonstration, it is assumed that if the single-link/node failure occurs in the communication topology, the rest of the weighted-balanced digraph should still remain connected, and thus the remaining nodes would be able to operate with their neighbouring nodes continuously [43]. Finally, the scalability analysis is validated in Case 5.4 in the IEEE 162-bus system with various RGs and ESSs, such as WTs, PVs, Solar thermal, BESSs and fuel cells.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Local Constraint of Each PEV: The allocated charging power of each PEV is locally bounded by different physical factors, such as the upper bound of outlet's power output, the charging current's tolerance and the charging level [21]. One local constraint is proposed to map the physical above constraints, i.e.,…”
Section: B Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case studies, the designed parameters are chosen as α = 12, β = 0.4, γ = 2, ε = 0.0085, which satisfy the condition in (21), and (25) specified in Theorem 4.1. In Case 5.1, we study the optimal charging problem with the constant total In this case, the total available charging power is assumed as 12kW.…”
Section: B Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions are used here to solve the above nonlinear optimization problem theoretically [20], [21]. As long as the values of the weight coefficients are determined, the optimal solution can be updated at each control instant.…”
Section: Utility Function-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%