2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-014-0527-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CorPITA: An Automated Algorithm for the Identification and Analysis of Coronal “EIT Waves”

Abstract: The continuous stream of data available from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) telescopes onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) spacecraft has allowed a deeper understanding of the Sun. However, the sheer volume of data has necessitated the development of automated techniques to identify and analyse various phenomena. In this article, we describe the Coronal Pulse Identification and Tracking Algorithm (CorPITA) for the identification and analysis of coronal "EIT waves". CorPITA uses an intensity-pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies have relied on visual inspection of EUV waves in difference or running difference images and movies, which becomes impractical for large data volumes (e.g., as provided by SDO/AIA). Two automatic wave detection algorithms have been developed: NEMO (Podladchikova and Berghmans, 2005;Podladchikova et al, 2012) is mainly geared towards the detection of dimming associated with EIT waves and eruptions, while CorPITA (Long et al, 2014) uses AIA 193Å difference images to identify and track coronal waves, including an automatic extraction of information on kinematics and pulse characteristics. There is hope that once these algorithms (after they have been carefully validated) will be able to generate the wave catalogs that are a prerequisite for many statistical studies.…”
Section: Frequency Of Occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of these studies have relied on visual inspection of EUV waves in difference or running difference images and movies, which becomes impractical for large data volumes (e.g., as provided by SDO/AIA). Two automatic wave detection algorithms have been developed: NEMO (Podladchikova and Berghmans, 2005;Podladchikova et al, 2012) is mainly geared towards the detection of dimming associated with EIT waves and eruptions, while CorPITA (Long et al, 2014) uses AIA 193Å difference images to identify and track coronal waves, including an automatic extraction of information on kinematics and pulse characteristics. There is hope that once these algorithms (after they have been carefully validated) will be able to generate the wave catalogs that are a prerequisite for many statistical studies.…”
Section: Frequency Of Occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warmuth et al, 2001). The latter method is now being used extensively for wave events observed at high cadences with SDO/AIA (e.g., Long et al, 2014).…”
Section: Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The events listed in the wave list of Nitta et al (2013) were processed using the Coronal Pulse Identification and Tracking Algorithm (CorPITA; Long et al, 2014). CorPITA is an automated code designed to identify, track and analyse global EUV waves using science quality data from the SDO/AIA 211 Å passband.…”
Section: Global Wave Characterisation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the measurement in each arc sector is therefore quantified in each case using a quality rating system, with the pulse scored according to the number of images used to identify it, the fitted initial velocity and acceleration and the uncertainty in identifying the pulse (cf. Long et al, 2014). Figure 1b shows the estimated quality rating for each of the arc sectors studied for the 7 June 2011 event.…”
Section: Global Wave Characterisation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate these measurements, we applied the automated Coronal Pulse Identification and Tracking Algorithm (CorPITA: Long et al, 2014) to HASTA Hα data. The average values are listed in the last row of Table 1; a similar value of average initial speed but an almost double value of initial deceleration are shown.…”
Section: Surface Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%