This paper explores the effect of borrower and lender state-ownership on the consequences of corporate fraud in the debt market. Fraud revelations can increase a firm's information and credit risk, and are therefore expected to significantly affect future bank loan conditions. The Chinese economy provides a unique setting from which to study the influence of state-ownership on debt contracting because it is dominated by state-owned banks and firms. Using a sample of bank loans and enforcement actions announced between 2001 and 2012, we find that, after fraud announcements, the cost of private debt increases significantly, but not for loans issued by state-owned banks to state-owned enterprises.Moreover, we find evidence that state-owned banks grant, and state-owned enterprises receive, lower interest rates. Additional tests show that state-owned enterprises that received a more favorable interest rate after the announcement of fraud from a state-owned bank perform worse than other firms. These results indicate that despite the bank reforms stateowned banks continue to favor state-owned enterprises and this could lead to sub-optimal lending.