2020
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2020.3007808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following pressure field data collection, the RF signal containing the peak pressure amplitude was extracted and further processed to compute the derated intensity and mechanical index. Spatial averaging effects caused by the large size of the needle hydrophone element compared with the focal spot size of the transducer were corrected to rescale the measured pressure amplitudes p ( t ) 54 . The pulse intensity integral of the pressure wave was then calculated, 55 PIIgoodbreak=1ρc0Tp2)(tnormaldtwhere c and ρ are the speed of sound and mass density of water, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following pressure field data collection, the RF signal containing the peak pressure amplitude was extracted and further processed to compute the derated intensity and mechanical index. Spatial averaging effects caused by the large size of the needle hydrophone element compared with the focal spot size of the transducer were corrected to rescale the measured pressure amplitudes p ( t ) 54 . The pulse intensity integral of the pressure wave was then calculated, 55 PIIgoodbreak=1ρc0Tp2)(tnormaldtwhere c and ρ are the speed of sound and mass density of water, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial averaging effects caused by the large size of the needle hydrophone element compared with the focal spot size of the transducer were corrected to rescale the measured pressure amplitudes p(t). 54 The pulse intensity integral of the pressure wave was then calculated, 55 where c and ρ are the speed of sound and mass density of water, respectively. Derating of the pulse intensity integral was done by assuming tissue attenuation to be 0.3 dB/MHz/ cm and that the pulse travels 200 μm from the sclera surface to the focus of the transducer.…”
Section: Safety Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their advantage is a significantly smaller sensor area with fiber core having only a few micrometers diameter compared to tens of micrometers for a typical multimode fiber. A more point-like detector therefore helps to accurately measure the pressure at a specific point [32] as well as offers higher sensor bandwidth in realistic configurations. Especially localized measurement is of interest for study of sonoporation [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%