2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10010098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Pushbroom Satellite Imagery Interior Distortions Independent of Ground Control Points

Abstract: Abstract:Compensating for distortions in pushbroom satellite imagery has a bearing on subsequent earth observation applications. Traditional distortion correction methods usually depend on ground control points (GCPs) acquired from a high-accuracy geometric calibration field (GCF). Due to the high construction costs and site constraints of GCF, it is difficult to perform distortion detection regularly. To solve this problem, distortion detection methods without using GCPs have been proposed, but their applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the space environment is complex and variable during satellite launch and operation [15,28,30,31], the geographic coordinates calculated by geometric calibration models with the pre-launch laboratory measurement parameters usually have geolocation errors of about several hundred meters to several kilometers [32,33]. In addition, the random error of the attitude measurement cannot be eliminated due to the lack of ground control points in polar regions.…”
Section: Automated Geometric Correction Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the space environment is complex and variable during satellite launch and operation [15,28,30,31], the geographic coordinates calculated by geometric calibration models with the pre-launch laboratory measurement parameters usually have geolocation errors of about several hundred meters to several kilometers [32,33]. In addition, the random error of the attitude measurement cannot be eliminated due to the lack of ground control points in polar regions.…”
Section: Automated Geometric Correction Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of computer vision, camera autonomous calibration methods have always been a hot research topic [21][22][23][24]. In the field of satellite remote sensing, on-orbit autonomous geometric calibration methods have also attracted more and more attention from researchers in recent years [17,[25][26][27][28]. Gresloud et al [25], on the basis of the agile imaging capabilities of the Pleiades [29], used two imaging methods of along-track push-broom and cross-track swing-scanning to obtain cross images with a yaw angle difference of nearly 90 • during a satellite transit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method greatly reduces the need for ground control points compared with the traditional on-orbit geometric calibration method based on the ground calibration field, there is still a gap with the on-orbit autonomous geometric calibration method (no ground control points at all) we pursue. Zhang et al [27] proposed using at least three images with overlapping regions to match homologous points and calculate the internal distortion of the instrument according to the forward intersection residual between the homologous points. However, this method only considers the calibration of the internal distortion of the spaceborne push-broom instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the optical remote sensing field, many scholars have researched methods for geometric self-calibration that do not rely on control data, achieving notable success [15,16]. In the field of SAR geometric calibration, researchers have also begun to study geometric calibration without field calibration control data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%