2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(03)01507-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of systematic errors in scanning force microscopy images with application to ion track micrographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13(a)]. This critical energy loss is in good agreement with the threshold observed for swelling 34 or when characterizing hillock appearance at the surface generated by individual ion impacts 72,83 [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)].…”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…13(a)]. This critical energy loss is in good agreement with the threshold observed for swelling 34 or when characterizing hillock appearance at the surface generated by individual ion impacts 72,83 [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)].…”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These observations are complementing previous investigations by means of surface profilometry to measure swelling, 34 atomic force microscopy 72,83 to observe surface hillocks, high resolution electron microscopy to determine track diameters, [72][73][74] and optical absorption spectroscopy to quantify the creation of color centers. 85 Compiling the large data set, we found evidence that specific phenomena appear above two different electronic energy-loss threshold values corresponding to two regimes of damage creation: (i) above S e ∼ 5 ± 2 keV/nm swelling appears, surface hillocks are formed, C-RBS reveals surface damage, and fragmentation into nanograins occurs; (ii) above ∼18 ± 3 keV/nm tracks are visualized by TEM and the areas of XRD peaks decrease significantly with increasing ion fluence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations