2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3436646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of the viscous drag induced errors in macromolecular manipulation experiments using atomic force microscope

Abstract: We describe a method to correct the errors induced by viscous drag on the cantilever in macromolecular manipulation experiments using the atomic force microscope. The cantilever experiences a viscous drag force in these experiments because of its motion relative to the surrounding liquid. This viscous force superimposes onto the force generated by the macromolecule under study, causing ambiguity in the experimental data. To remove this artifact, we analyzed the motions of the cantilever and the liquid in macro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured unfolding forces are underestimated in high‐viscosity solutions due to the viscous drag on the AFM cantilever 35–38. A way to remove this artifact has been recently reported 35.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured unfolding forces are underestimated in high‐viscosity solutions due to the viscous drag on the AFM cantilever 35–38. A way to remove this artifact has been recently reported 35.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The measured unfolding forces are underestimated in high‐viscosity solutions due to the viscous drag on the AFM cantilever 35–38. A way to remove this artifact has been recently reported 35. According to the this procedure the drag force can be computed as where v liquid is the pulling velocity, v tip is the velocity of the tip, b l and b c are viscous drag coefficients related to the liquid motion and the bending of the cantilever (tip motion), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SI Sec. 5 we have analyzed possible errors from several sources: the finite force resolution of AFM cantilever, the non-negligible hydrodynamic drag on the cantilever at large pulling speeds (¿ 1 µm/s) [39][40][41], uncertainties arising from finite sampling of the rupture force distributions, and the apparatus response time. Based on this error analysis, we conclude that the estimation of the heterogeneity parameter ∆ from the experimental data is reliable in all the systems of Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in experiments the magnitude of the rupture force is defined as the difference in the pre-rupture and post-rupture force levels, the drag creates a velocity-dependent artifact. The magnitude of the error in the measured rupture force depends also on velocity of the cantilever tip pre-rupture, and hence the stiffness of the sample: the softer the sample, the smaller the velocity difference of the tip pre-and post-rupture, and the smaller the error [39][40][41]. However in typical biomolecule rupture experiments the sample at the point of rupture is maximally extended, with large stiffness, and the tip velocity is much slower than the pulling velocity.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of the Heterogeneity Analysis To Experimental Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFM force measurements on soft samples in fluid environments are affected by a hydrodynamic drag force, which results from the viscous friction of the cantilever with the surrounding fluid. This effect appears more significant when cantilever-tip velocities are above a few µm/s [4,[13][14][15]. Under such circumstances, the drag force is dependent upon factors including the stiffness, dimensions and velocity of the cantilever, the fluid viscosity, and the cantilever/tip-surface separation [4,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%