2006
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/17/3/s07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of topography measurements of NIST SRM 2460 standard bullets by four techniques

Abstract: Three optical instruments including an interferometric microscope, a Nipkow disc confocal microscope and a laser scanning confocal microscope and a stylus instrument are used for the measurements of bullet profile signatures of a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2460 standard bullet. The two-dimensional profile signatures are compared with the virtual bullet standard signature established by the same stylus instrument. The bullet signature differences are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This electromagnetic surface, as it is called in the ISO standards, will vary from optical instrument to optical instrument, although there are many common underlying features of optical instruments [25], and may or may not be significantly different from the mechanical surface. Ideally, under carefully controlled conditions of measurement and filtering, the topography of the optical surface may not be significantly different from that of the mechanical surface [161].…”
Section: The Optical Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This electromagnetic surface, as it is called in the ISO standards, will vary from optical instrument to optical instrument, although there are many common underlying features of optical instruments [25], and may or may not be significantly different from the mechanical surface. Ideally, under carefully controlled conditions of measurement and filtering, the topography of the optical surface may not be significantly different from that of the mechanical surface [161].…”
Section: The Optical Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protocol has been shown to effectively remove long wavelength two-dimensional distortions from three-dimensional data with minimum influence on the magnitude of the short wavelength (roughness) components. [26] After a series of parametric evaluations, we achieved the most effective filtering with a filter mask of 107.8 lm and a long wavelength cutoff of 34.4 lm. The change in the shape of the PDFs in Figure 4(c) shown before and after the application of the PCG filter demonstrates that the application of this high-pass filter considerably reduced the influence of the distortion.…”
Section: ½1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several 3D imaging methods, for example scanning white light interferometry (SWLI), confocal microscopy (CM), conoscopic holography, and dynamic focusing techniques, have been applied in forensic work , to make comparing samples more efficient than what is currently possible with 2D imaging. Recent articles present CM and SWLI as suitable measurement methods for forensic 3D imaging of toolmarks on metal samples. Although cm‐size samples have been studied extensively and although 3D methods have potential to be used on smaller marks , only few results on cutter marks on thin wires have been published.…”
Section: Consecutive Matching Striae (Cms) Is a Common Criterium To Tmentioning
confidence: 99%