2016
DOI: 10.1109/mc.2016.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortically Coupled Computing: A New Paradigm for Synergistic Human-Machine Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are much larger (see Section 2.3 for more details on our within-and cross-subject analyses). We apply an average pooling layer of size (1,4) to reduce the sampling rate of the signal to 32Hz. We also regularize each spatial filter by using a maximum norm constraint of 1 on its weights; w 2 < 1.…”
Section: Eegnet: Compact Cnn Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are much larger (see Section 2.3 for more details on our within-and cross-subject analyses). We apply an average pooling layer of size (1,4) to reduce the sampling rate of the signal to 32Hz. We also regularize each spatial filter by using a maximum norm constraint of 1 on its weights; w 2 < 1.…”
Section: Eegnet: Compact Cnn Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) 0.8866 (2) 0.9076 (3) 0.8910 (4) 0.8747 (1,2) 0.8875 (1,3) 0.8593 (1,4) 0.8325 (2,3) 0.8923 (2,4) 0.8721 (3,4) 0.8206 (1,2,3) 0.8637 (1,2,4) 0.8202 (1,3,4) 0.7108 (2,3,4) 0.7970 None 0.9054 Table 4: Performance of a cross-subject trained EEGNet-4,1 model when removing certain filters from the model, then using the model to predict the test set for one randomly chosen fold of the P300 dataset. AUC values in bold denote the best performing model when removing 1, 2 or 3 filters at a time.…”
Section: Filters Removed Test Set Aucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as our decoding approach (1) can be pre-trained, (2) is capable of ignoring co-morbid, experimentally induced components or artifacts, and (3) exhibits a certain amount of invariance to temporal uncertainty, this work represents an important extension beyond the traditional approaches employed in the measurement and interpretation of neural phenomena. We believe the use of such CNN-based decoding will enable more complex, real-world neuroscience research [55][56][57]. By allowing the experimenter to develop decoding models from precisely controlled laboratory experiments, yet analyze data from a much smaller number of trials without requiring the same level of temporal precision, CNNs such as the one presented here, can help bridge the gap between our knowledge of how the brain functions in the laboratory and how it may function in the real-world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human augmentation aims at extending human cognitive abilities, often in a situated, task-specific fashion. Previous research has demonstrated through various implemented prototypes and experiments the feasibility of extending human perceptive abilities or information processing and decision-making abilities [ 1 , 2 ]. In the latter case, Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are poised to play a significant role in providing the task-specific information processing power supporting the augmentation aspects.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although human augmentation systems have been developed prior to the popularisation of Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCI), these have taken a more prominent role in recent years, as they offer a seamless mechanism to capture elements of human cognitive processes in a way that enables the synchronisation of computations [ 1 , 2 ]. With the rise of autonomous intelligent systems, a new application of human augmentation has been suggested in order to keep humans in control of autonomous AI systems whose performance could potentially exceed even that of human experts.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%