1983
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.03-07-01355.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticotropin-releasing factor immunoreactivity is widely distributed within the central nervous system of the rat: an immunohistochemical study

Abstract: The discovery of a 41-amino acid peptide with potent corticotropin-releasing factor properties has prompted a search for neurons that contain this substance and potentially utilize it in intercellular communication. The present study utilized immunohistochemical methods and an antiserum directed against a synthetic replica of ovine corticotropin-releasing factor. The rat hypothalamus was found to contain striking immunoreactive groups of neuronal perikarya within the paraventricular, periventricular, and anter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
180
1
3

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
11
180
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Microinjections into the central nucleus of the amygdala of lower doses of the CRF antagonist also reversed the anxiogenic-like effects of alcohol withdrawal (Rassnick et al, 1993), and similar doses of the CRF antagonist injected into the amygdala were active in reversing opiate-induced conditioned place aversion (Heinrichs et al, 1995). Studies using in vivo microdialysis have shown that rats withdrawn from chronic alcohol, withdrawn from chronic cocaine, and precipitously withdrawn from chronic cannabinoids show increases in the release of CRF from the central nucleus of the amygdala (Cummings et al, 1983;Merlo-Pich et al, 1995;Rodriguez de Fonseca et al, 1997). Particularly intriguing are recent studies demonstrating a role for norepinephrine in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the conditioned place aversions associated with opiate withdrawal (Delfs et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microinjections into the central nucleus of the amygdala of lower doses of the CRF antagonist also reversed the anxiogenic-like effects of alcohol withdrawal (Rassnick et al, 1993), and similar doses of the CRF antagonist injected into the amygdala were active in reversing opiate-induced conditioned place aversion (Heinrichs et al, 1995). Studies using in vivo microdialysis have shown that rats withdrawn from chronic alcohol, withdrawn from chronic cocaine, and precipitously withdrawn from chronic cannabinoids show increases in the release of CRF from the central nucleus of the amygdala (Cummings et al, 1983;Merlo-Pich et al, 1995;Rodriguez de Fonseca et al, 1997). Particularly intriguing are recent studies demonstrating a role for norepinephrine in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the conditioned place aversions associated with opiate withdrawal (Delfs et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the adjacent norepinephrine (NE) neurons of the locus coeruleus (LC, A6), these NO neurons, which coexpress acetylcholine (4,35), constitute an important component of the reticular activating system (RAS) vital for arousal. Likewise, CRH neurons in the PPTg and in Barrington's nucleus (BN), located immediately adjacent to the LDT and LC (36), are also Math1-dependent. The BN contains the largest group of CRH neurons in the hindbrain, responds to the interoceptive inputs of bladder and colon distension, and projects to the LC to increase the activity of NE neurons and stimulate arousal (37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post et al, 1981;Charney et al, 1993), such effects might be amplified by stress-induced kindling of various limbic areas, including the amygdala and BNST. The amygdala and BNST show particularly dense concentrations of CRH cell bodies and receptors (Cummings et al, 1983;De Souza et al, 1984;Sawchenko and Swanson, 1985;Sakanaka et al, 1987;Chalmers et al, 1995;Lovenberg et al, 1995), and chronic stress increased CRH mRNA in the CeA and BNST (Mamalaki et al, 1992;Makino et al, 1994aMakino et al, ,b, 1995. Taken together, these data raise the possibility that stress may sensitize CRH systems in limbic structures, such as the amygdala and/or BNST, leading to a persistent increase in CRH transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%