2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost–benefit of different methods for monitoring invasive corals on tropical rocky reefs in the southwest Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection and photoquadrat methods require a considerable time cost in the laboratory to identify and quantify species (Table 3). The total time cost per area considered to be representative for each method is the highest for the collection method, intermediate for the photoquadrat method and the lowest for the in situ visual method (Table 3), as observed for Atlantic assemblages (Mantelatto et al 2013). The collection method is limited by both diving and laboratory time.…”
Section: Cost Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The collection and photoquadrat methods require a considerable time cost in the laboratory to identify and quantify species (Table 3). The total time cost per area considered to be representative for each method is the highest for the collection method, intermediate for the photoquadrat method and the lowest for the in situ visual method (Table 3), as observed for Atlantic assemblages (Mantelatto et al 2013). The collection method is limited by both diving and laboratory time.…”
Section: Cost Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Several methods for studying rocky benthic assemblages have been compared in different locations (e.g. Dethier et al 1993, Mantelatto et al 2013, Schonberg 2015, but studies are lacking in the Mediterranean area (but see Benedetti-Cecchi et al 1996, Parravicini et al 2010, Piazzi et al 2014. More direct and quantitative comparisons between different methodologies are needed, especially comparing destructive vs. non-destructive methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, the method using photos bring a superior accuracy in the assessment of relative cover based on a supervised semi-automated method of numerical classification. The used method also provides enhanced reproducibility and taxonomic resolution, when compared with underwater visual census, since images are stored in hard drives and may be analyzed repeatedly (Ohlhorst et al, 1988;Mantelatto et al, 2013). No less important, the coral SR per site was reasonably well estimated as indicated by the asymptotic shape of most of the curves of species accumulation vs. samples (Supplementary Material S7).…”
Section: The Spatial Scale Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is scientific consensus that we are experiencing a drastic global decline in total coral cover due to both natural and anthropogenic stresses (Gardner et al ; Graham et al ; De'ath et al ), which has flow on effects for ecosystem services (Pratchett et al ). As coral cover continues to fall, reliable monitoring data becomes a priority to inform effective management decisions that can prevent a further decline and encourage recovery of coral reefs (Aronson et al ; Houk and Van Woesik ; Mantelatto et al ). Yet, coral cover as a criterion alone may be ineffective for guiding management protocols (McClanahan et al ), as future monitoring programs need to consider the overall composition and structure of benthic assemblages and the processes that drive change in these communities (Hughes et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deciding upon the most appropriate way to assess change in benthic communities should be based primarily on the type of information required, the repeatability of the method and the level of precision (Dumas et al ; Tyne et al ; Mantelatto et al ). Choice of method is typically constrained by field and analysis time, human expertize and available budget.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%