2012
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2012.11680791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Postoperative Surveillance Protocols Following Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early detection of CRC by screening and progress in treatment techniques had led to decreased mortality of CRC [ 9 ]. There are different options for screening and surveillance of CRC with each of them having distinctive advantages, cost-effectiveness, limitations and risks [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection of CRC by screening and progress in treatment techniques had led to decreased mortality of CRC [ 9 ]. There are different options for screening and surveillance of CRC with each of them having distinctive advantages, cost-effectiveness, limitations and risks [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies assessed the cost-effectiveness of long-term survivorship care in patients previously treated for colorectal cancer. Three were retrospective data analyses [ 18 , 19 , 20 ] and the remaining four were model-based [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Staib et al [ 20 ] estimated the cost per recurrence detected through the existing intensive follow-up strategy in the German setting, which was estimated to be EUR 6000 from a hospital perspective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another UK study, Macafee et al [ 22 ] used retrospective data for a five-year projection comparing an intensive follow-up strategy with a standard follow-up strategy, concluding that an intensive follow-up would cost an additional GBP 15.4 million over 5 years, with a cost per additional resectable recurrence of GBP 18,077. An Italian study compared several combinations of diagnostic tests for follow-up of patients after curative resection of colorectal cancer [ 19 ]. The combination of physical examination, rigid sigmoidoscopy, thorax–abdominal CT and CeA testing was found to be the most cost-effective strategy to monitor stage III and IV colorectal cancer, while physical examination, colonoscopy, thorax–abdominal CT and CeA testing were found to be the most cost-effective methods to monitor stages I and II of colon cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each test has unique advantages, cost-effectiveness, limitations and risks [12], [13]. A positive stool blood test, gFOBT or FIT, should be followed up with colonoscopy to determine if the cancer or advanced polyps is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%