2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-sensitive rough set approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the decision costs related to three different regions are shown in Table 5. With a careful investigation of Table 5, we notice that the reducing of total decision costs shown in Figure 4 [8,14,49]) and NON-NEG-Reduct (nonnegative region extension based attribute reduction [49]). The details are shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Experiments On Raw Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the decision costs related to three different regions are shown in Table 5. With a careful investigation of Table 5, we notice that the reducing of total decision costs shown in Figure 4 [8,14,49]) and NON-NEG-Reduct (nonnegative region extension based attribute reduction [49]). The details are shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Experiments On Raw Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, DTRS may contain two important aspects: (1) information granulation and (2) decision costs. On the one hand, different types of information granulations may be used to construct different models [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. For example, the classical DTRS is formed based on the indiscernibility relation [4]; similar to Pawlak's rough set, such model is only useful in analyzing categorical data; Li et al [16] have proposed a neighborhood based DTRS, in which the result of information granulation is expressed by neighborhoods of samples; Song et al [15] have proposed a fuzzy based DTRS, in which the result of information granulation is reflected by fuzzy relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rough set theory [1] is an effective mathematical tool to qualitatively and quantitatively describe the uncertainty information in data. Due to such characteristics, it has been frequently applied in attribute reduction [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], which aims to select a condition attribute subset that can retain the identifiable ability of the original data. It should be pointed out that among existing attribute reduction methods, fuzzy rough set-based ones [10][11][12][13][14][15] are widely concerned with handling indiscernibility and fuzziness in data with realvalued condition attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, binary relation is effective to conduct information granulation [17][18][19][20][21]. In the classical rough set [22][23][24][25], binary relation is an equivalence relation, and each single equivalence class can be regarded as an information granule [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%