2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8838-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-pressure-assisted ITP with electrokinetic injection under field-amplified conditions for bacterial analysis

Abstract: Counter-pressure was used to extend the duration of field-amplified sample injection in isotachophoresis (FASI-ITP) in order to improve the detection of bacterial cells. Using 0.51-μm negatively charged encapsulated fluorescent beads as a model, the counter-pressure, injection and separation voltages, and times were optimized. Using 6-min 8,963-Pa counter-pressure FASI-ITP injections at -12 kV followed by mobilization of the ITP band with continued injection at -6 kV, the limit of detection (LOD) for Escherich… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of the electrokinetic injection of sample is the movement of the stacking boundary during the long FASI step. Many approaches in the last 10 years were proposed for the immobilization of the stacking boundary through application of a counterflow (CF‐EKS) or employing the EOF to cease the movement of the stacking boundary . Recently, the Chung's group revisited CF‐EKS for the sensitive speciation of arsenic in water samples .…”
Section: Combinations Of Stacking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the electrokinetic injection of sample is the movement of the stacking boundary during the long FASI step. Many approaches in the last 10 years were proposed for the immobilization of the stacking boundary through application of a counterflow (CF‐EKS) or employing the EOF to cease the movement of the stacking boundary . Recently, the Chung's group revisited CF‐EKS for the sensitive speciation of arsenic in water samples .…”
Section: Combinations Of Stacking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breadmore et al. reinvestigated the application of a hydrodynamic counterflow in order to immobilize the stacking boundary for enrichment of bacterial cells. After filling the capillary with the LE (50 mM Tris‐HCl, pH 8.0 with 0.5% w/v of PVP), the counter pressure was employed during EKI of the sample.…”
Section: Sequential Stacking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phung et al. introduced a counter‐flow EKI for cells to prolong the enhanced field and enhance detection limits . Using LIF and staining the cells with a universal nucleic acid dye, E. coli could be detected down to 78 cells/mL, from a 100 μL volume of sample.…”
Section: Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phung et al. described the use of counter‐pressure‐assisted ITP (LE: HCl, 50 mM Tris, 0.5% w/v PVP, pH 8.0; TE: 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.8; LIF detection) with electrokinetic injection for bacterial cell analysis. Using 6‐min counter‐pressure electrokinetic injections followed by mobilization of the ITP zone with continued injection, the LOD for E. coli was improved to 78 cells/mL, a factor of 4 when compared with injection without counter‐pressure.…”
Section: Analytical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%