“…Due to the restrictions in the quantification of consumed prey volume, many trophic studies only use presence/absence data (e.g., Deagle et al., ; Harms‐Tuohy et al., ; Pinol, Mir, Gomez‐Polo, & Agusti, ). This might, however, result in an overestimation of small taxa that are abundant in the sediment, but with low trophic relevance, as they could, in the case of C. crangon , be passively acquired when shrimp ingest sediment to crush food in their stomach (Ansell et al., ; Deagle et al., ; Tiews, ). Multiple stomachs were pooled prior to analysis and data were subjected to rigorous filtering to allow for a semiquantitative estimation of proportions of prey DNA (Deagle et al., ; Lejzerowicz et al., ; Pompanon et al., ; Thomas, Deagle, Eveson, Harsch, & Trites, ).…”