2018
DOI: 10.3390/jmse6030096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled and Decoupled Force/Motion Controllers for an Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator System

Abstract: Autonomous interaction with the underwater environment has increased the interest of scientists in the study of control structures for lightweight underwater vehicle-manipulator systems. This paper presents an essential comparison between two different strategies of designing control laws for a lightweight underwater vehicle-manipulator system. The first strategy aims to separately control the vehicle and the manipulator and hereafter is referred to as the decoupled approach. The second method, the coupled app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the target stiffness k d of the impedance control is determined firstly according to the steady-state pose error and the maximum allowable contact force error. If the environment stiffness is k E , the target stiffness k d should be far less than the environment stiffness, and the damping ratio ξneeds to satisfy the following equation ( 15) [17],…”
Section: Discretization Of the Impedance Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the target stiffness k d of the impedance control is determined firstly according to the steady-state pose error and the maximum allowable contact force error. If the environment stiffness is k E , the target stiffness k d should be far less than the environment stiffness, and the damping ratio ξneeds to satisfy the following equation ( 15) [17],…”
Section: Discretization Of the Impedance Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ( Olguín-Díaz et al, 2013 ) and ( Heshmati-Alamdari et al, 2018 ), the authors proposed a force/position control approach with a task-priority-based redundancy method where contact force trajectories for the end effector were defined as the primary task and a posture of the UVMS as the secondary tasks. In ( Barbalata et al, 2018 ) and ( Razzanelli et al, 2019 ), the authors designed the force/position controllers for the contact interaction of the end effector of UVMS with environment. In ( Cieslak and Ridao, 2018 ), an admittance control (position-based impedance control) was developed for contact force control of UVMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because UVMS consists of two subsystems, vehicle station-keeping and manipulator motion control are also important. There are many different control methods, such as PID control [40], model-based motion control [9,41], adaptive backstepping control [42][43][44][45], model predictive control [46][47][48][49][50][51][52], adaptive control [53,54], active disturbance rejection control [55,56], force/position control [36,57], dynamic surface control [58,59], and so on. In addition, sliding mode control of UVMS for second-order system is common and reliable, such as sliding mode impedance control [60], terminal sliding control [43,53,[61][62][63][64], dynamic sliding mode control [65], robust sliding mode control [5], multiple sliding mode methods [66], dynamic neural network [67], double-loop sliding mode control [68][69][70], adaptive sliding mode PID control [71], fuzzy sliding mode control [72][73][74][75], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%