2019
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2019030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling non-conforming discretizations of PDEs by spectral approximation of the Lagrange multiplier space

Abstract: This work focuses on the development of a non-conforming domain decomposition method for the approximation of PDEs based on weakly imposed transmission conditions: the continuity of the global solution is enforced by a discrete number of Lagrange multipliers defined over the interfaces of adjacent subdomains. The method falls into the class of primal hybrid methods, which also include the well-known mortar method. Differently from the mortar method, we discretize the space of basis functions on the interface b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If ( u , p ) satisfies W1 , then ( , , { σ (u, p )n jm } m ∈ N ( j ) ) is also solution of the local problem W2 , for every j = 1, …, N Ω . The Lagrange multipliers therefore play the role of the stress at the interfaces; for details, see, e.g., [ 25 , 43 ]. Conversely, if ( u j , p j , { λ [ jm ] } m ∈ N ( j ) ) are the local solutions of W2 , then is solution of W1 .…”
Section: Modular Domain-decomposition Of Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If ( u , p ) satisfies W1 , then ( , , { σ (u, p )n jm } m ∈ N ( j ) ) is also solution of the local problem W2 , for every j = 1, …, N Ω . The Lagrange multipliers therefore play the role of the stress at the interfaces; for details, see, e.g., [ 25 , 43 ]. Conversely, if ( u j , p j , { λ [ jm ] } m ∈ N ( j ) ) are the local solutions of W2 , then is solution of W1 .…”
Section: Modular Domain-decomposition Of Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular approaches rely on the introduction of suitable Lagrange multipliers at the interfaces to enforce transmission conditions, as in W2 ; see, e.g., the well-known mortar method [ 44 46 ] and INTERNODES [ 47 , 48 ]. In this paper, we adopt the algorithm presented in [ 25 ], which is based on the discretization of the Lagrange multipliers space via a small number of spectral basis functions defined on the interfaces. For our application, this choice is convenient because (i) the method allows us to recover the h -convergence order of the primal discretization method—i.e., the FE method—even when a small number of spectral basis functions is considered, (ii) defining a spectral basis on each interface does not require to project nor to interpolate the traces of FE basis functions from one side to the other, and (iii) as already mentioned, the interfaces are circular in the target configuration, which allows us to employ a set of standard orthonormal basis functions on the two-dimensional disk.…”
Section: Modular Domain-decomposition Of Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The global flow approximations by our ROM is computed as composition of local (to the subdomains) solutions, namely linear combinations of the basis functions defined in every subdomain scaled by the divergence-free Piola transformation. The local solutions are coupled by a nonconforming domain-decomposition method based on the use of spectral Lagrange multipliers on the 2D interfaces [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%