2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalently coating dextran on macroporous polyglycidyl methacrylate microsphere enabled rapid protein chromatographic separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macroporous poly(GMA-co-EGDMA) microspheres were prepared by the surfactant reverse micelle swelling method, which is an easy and novel method of preparing macroporous microspheres with a pore size of 140-200 nm. 20 In comparison with the ST-co-DVB 17 and GMA-co-DVB 30 systems, the lower hydrophobicity of the GMA-co-EGDMA system led to microspheres with a smaller pore size, which weakened the separation between the water-surfactant phase and the polymer phase. However, we found that microspheres with a larger pore size were obtained by changing the amount of EGDMA (40 wt % of monomer phase) and increasing the amount of Span80 (27.5 wt % of monomer phase) and Na 2 SO 4 (0.05 wt % of aqueous phase), in which microspheres with a maximum pore size of around 370 nm and particle size in the range 20-50 μm were obtained.…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Functionalized Microspheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroporous poly(GMA-co-EGDMA) microspheres were prepared by the surfactant reverse micelle swelling method, which is an easy and novel method of preparing macroporous microspheres with a pore size of 140-200 nm. 20 In comparison with the ST-co-DVB 17 and GMA-co-DVB 30 systems, the lower hydrophobicity of the GMA-co-EGDMA system led to microspheres with a smaller pore size, which weakened the separation between the water-surfactant phase and the polymer phase. However, we found that microspheres with a larger pore size were obtained by changing the amount of EGDMA (40 wt % of monomer phase) and increasing the amount of Span80 (27.5 wt % of monomer phase) and Na 2 SO 4 (0.05 wt % of aqueous phase), in which microspheres with a maximum pore size of around 370 nm and particle size in the range 20-50 μm were obtained.…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Functionalized Microspheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, they must possess minimal affinity to compounds other than the separated ones, that is, they must ensure minimal nonspecific interactions. Minimization of the nonspecific adsorption onto the particle surface can be achieved by modification with various polymers, for example, gelatin, dextran, albumin, poly( N ‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm), and most frequently poly(ethylene glycol) . The ability to resist nonspecific protein adsorption depends not only on the character of the polymer used for the modification but also on its molecular weight (degree of polymerization) and the quality of the surface coverage (graft density) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different routes for coating macroporous supports with organic and inorganic materials have been explored in recent years. [1][2][3] The materials coated onto macroporous supports include extended networks such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are synthesized by the self-assembly of metal ions and an organic part, at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 250 C. [4][5][6] MOFs have desirable characteristics such as high surface area, and high structural and functional diversity. 6,7 To improve their ease of handling and efficiency, they are prepared as MOF composites where the MOFs are grown on a variety of substrates, including macroporous polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%