2020
DOI: 10.5455/jjee.204-1585312246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Detection from X-ray Images Using Different Artificial Intelligence Hybrid Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 5 , it is found that some of the proposed systems [ 22 , 28 , 31 , 31 , [53] , [54] , [55] ], and [ 56 ] obtained a slightly lower accuracy in range of 80.6%–92.3%. The moderately highest accuracy of 93.5%, 95.2%, 95.4%, 98.3% and 98.3% are found in [ 23 , 26 , 29 , 57 ], and [ 25 ] respectively. The system developed in [ 58 ] obtained an overall accuracy of 98.08% considering the multi-classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From Table 5 , it is found that some of the proposed systems [ 22 , 28 , 31 , 31 , [53] , [54] , [55] ], and [ 56 ] obtained a slightly lower accuracy in range of 80.6%–92.3%. The moderately highest accuracy of 93.5%, 95.2%, 95.4%, 98.3% and 98.3% are found in [ 23 , 26 , 29 , 57 ], and [ 25 ] respectively. The system developed in [ 58 ] obtained an overall accuracy of 98.08% considering the multi-classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system developed in [ 58 ] obtained an overall accuracy of 98.08% considering the multi-classes. Moreover, a comparison between existing systems in terms of computational time depicted that the system developed in [ 23 ] required 6.3s to classify 21 test images [ 25 ], needed 2277.6s for 8997 training images [ 31 ], took 2641.0s and 4.0s for training and testing of 40 and 10 images respectively, and [ 56 ] consumed 79184.3s and 262.0s for training and testing of 4449 and 1638 images respectively. In our experiment, the CNN architecture required 18950.0s and 114.0s for training and testing 3660 and 915 images respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An accuracy of 98.3% was obtained from the SqueezeNet model. Alqudah et al 21 implemented a hybrid system for distinguishing the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The hybrid system utilized CNN and machine learning techniques such as SVM and random forest (RF).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these advantages of X-ray imaging, many researchers have exerted efforts to find an accurate COVID-19 detection tool using chest X-ray images [7][8][9]. Researchers in [10] used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in the early detection of COVID19 using chest X-ray images. These images were classified using several machine learning algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural network (CNN), and random forest (RF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%