2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack onset in stretched open hole PMMA plates considering linear and non-linear elastic behaviours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the initiation stress variation measured experimentally is well reproduced numerically for a v crack =700 m/s crack velocity. This crack velocity is in the order of magnitude of experimentally measured crack velocities in PMMA [11,60,61,62,63].…”
Section: Circular Hole Specimen Under Tensile Loadingmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the initiation stress variation measured experimentally is well reproduced numerically for a v crack =700 m/s crack velocity. This crack velocity is in the order of magnitude of experimentally measured crack velocities in PMMA [11,60,61,62,63].…”
Section: Circular Hole Specimen Under Tensile Loadingmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore, the property of stress and energy proportionality to respectively the prescribed loading and the square of prescribed loading is no longer valid. Similarly to CC application involving nonlinear material behaviors [10,11,12,13], the stress and the energy conditions must therefore be evaluated for several loading levels in order to determine the minimum time t c corresponding to a loading level U c = U (t c ) for which both conditions are simultaneously fulfilled. It reverts to solving the following problem:…”
Section: Transient Dynamic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach proved to be a robust and efficient way to predict crack initiation in many configurations such as, e.g., weak or strong singularities, non-singular stress raisers (Weißgraeber et al 2016;Doitrand et al 2020b). Initially developed under small deformation assumption and linear elastic 2D framework, it has since then been extended to 3D (Leguillon et al 2014;Yosibash et al 2016;García et al 2016;Doitrand et al 2018a;Doitrand et al 2018b), to consider material or geometry nonlinearities (Leguillon et al 2017;Li et al 2019;Rosendahl et al 2019;Doitrand et al 2020c;Leite et al 2021), as well as dynamic crack initiation (Doitrand et al 2022;Chao Correas et al 2022). It also revealed efficient for small scale fracture assessment (Doitrand et al 2020a;Gallo et al 2020;Jimenez Alfaro et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CC is computationally efficient since it generally requires only a few linear elastic calculations. It can also account for nonlinearities [8,9,10,11]. The CC efficiency compared to other fracture modeling approach is particularly highlighted in the context of inverse identification approaches of the fracture parameters [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%