2011
DOI: 10.1177/1090198110379571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating an Instrument to Measure People’s Perception of Community Capacity in American Indian Communities

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of community capacity for American Indian communities. The study included development and testing phases to ensure face, content, construct, and predictive validity. There were 500 participants in two southwest tribes who completed a detailed community profile, which contained 21 common items in five dimensions (communication, sense of community, youth, elders, and language/culture). In addition, subscales of women and leadership were included in one tribe eac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this perspective, although not specific to IRSs, elders attributed their community’s high rates of alcoholism and child maltreatment to historically traumatic events (Whitbeck, Adams, et al., 2004). As well, levels of historical loss were associated with responses to a newly developed measure of community capacity, and to measures of social capital and “community influence” among members of two southwest American Indian tribes ( Oetzel et al., 2011 ). This may suggest that communities less affected by IRS or other historical traumas may have a greater capacity to achieve self-government, as well as local control over child welfare, health, education, and policing services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this perspective, although not specific to IRSs, elders attributed their community’s high rates of alcoholism and child maltreatment to historically traumatic events (Whitbeck, Adams, et al., 2004). As well, levels of historical loss were associated with responses to a newly developed measure of community capacity, and to measures of social capital and “community influence” among members of two southwest American Indian tribes ( Oetzel et al., 2011 ). This may suggest that communities less affected by IRS or other historical traumas may have a greater capacity to achieve self-government, as well as local control over child welfare, health, education, and policing services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified community leadership as a key capacity dimension, including leadership directives, community participation, and the social-political climate. Others have shown that leadership is a critical element of community capacity and competence (Baezconde-Garbanati et al, 2007; Bopp, GermAnn, Bopp, Baugh Littlejohns, & Smith, 2000; Chaskin, 2001; Goodman et al, 1998; Laverack, 1999; Maclellan-Wright et al, 2007; Oetzel et al, 2011). Labonte and Laverack (2001) also suggest capacity-building efforts for community participation and leadership in the form of organizing events based around local interest for community members, and working with elected and informal leaders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dimension includes a community’s understanding of its actual needs and values. Other reports use the dimension “sense of community” to convey a community’s understanding of, and investment in, itself (Baezconde-Garbanati et al, 2007; Bopp et al, 2000; Maclellan-Wright et al, 2007; Oetzel et al, 2011). These two dimensions are areas where funding agencies could increase their capacity for partnering with AI communities by supporting local efforts to increase community participation in the application process and beyond, and by encouraging communities to apply for funding opportunities that are directly related to community need and/or consistent with community values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Goodman et al [32], this theory offers a framework for understanding patterns for community building [32], and is comprised of the following dimensions: citizen participation, community power, community values, critical reflection, leadership, resources, sense of community, skills, social/organizational networks, and understanding community history. This theory has been applied to partnership development [36,[40][41][42][43][44], program evaluation [45][46][47][48][49][50][51], and community organizing and policy advocacy [52,53]. In many ways, building community capacity is the "bottom-up" strategy of strengthening and developing skills, redistributing power, and increasing control over resources and decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%