1993
DOI: 10.3386/w4277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminal Deterrence: Revisiting the Issue with a Birth Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…School attendance affects crime rates negatively through both a voluntary attendance effect and an incapacitation effect. For example, Tauchen et al (1994) provide evidence that the percentage of years in education has a negative effect on the probability of arrest. Exogenous events, such as teachers' strikes (Jacob and Lefgren 2003) or teacher training days (Luallen 2006), has been used to identify the incapacitation effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…School attendance affects crime rates negatively through both a voluntary attendance effect and an incapacitation effect. For example, Tauchen et al (1994) provide evidence that the percentage of years in education has a negative effect on the probability of arrest. Exogenous events, such as teachers' strikes (Jacob and Lefgren 2003) or teacher training days (Luallen 2006), has been used to identify the incapacitation effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is caused by tertiary education attendance that is not completely voluntary, but conditional on eligibility. Voluntary educational attendance effects (Tauchen et al 1994) and educational incapacitation effects on crime have been investigated previously (Jacob and Lefgren 2003;Luallen 2006;Å slund et al 2012;Anderson 2014) and have been found to affect crime rates, but tertiary education eligibility effects on crime rates have not been investigated. Because criminal behaviour peaks in late adolescence (see for example Hirschi and Gottfredson 1983;Hansen 2003;Å slund et al 2012), tertiary education eligibility may reduce crime rates substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exploit this relationship between the price and the smuggler's punishment upon apprehension to derive an instrumental variable for the smuggling price in the empirical section below 24 . 2 4 There are two other potential explanations why prices increase with enforcement.…”
Section: Comparative Staticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large literature demonstrates that enforcement has indeed a deterrence e¤ect on criminal behavior (for example, Ehrlich, 1977; Levitt, 1997;Tauchen, Witte and Griesinger, 1994; Viscusi, 1986;Witte, 1980). For illegal drugs and similar markets, deterrence depends on two parameters: the e¤ect of enforcement on prices and the price elasticity of demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, traditional welfare and general assistance programs may encourage crime among the unskilled by encouraging individuals to earn unreported criminal income (or to not report legitimate income -a different form of crime). 38 Since violent and property crime rates peak during the late teenage years, it might seem costeffective to target wage subsidies to adolescents and young adults if reductions in crime are an important policy objective. While a targeted wage subsidy should increase work and decrease crime for the duration of the subsidy, it is also likely to reduce skill investment by raising the opportunity costs of investment more than the returns.…”
Section: Tax and Subsidy Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%