2014
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Considerations for the Qualitative and Quantitative Determination of Process‐Induced Disorder in Crystalline Solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical nature of partially disordered particles has been the object of considerable discussion in the literature (Bordet et al, 2016; Dujardin et al, 2013; Luisi et al, 2012; Newman and Zografi, 2014; Pazesh et al, 2017) and it has been proposed that they may be composed of crystallites surrounded by crystal defects or alternatively be composed of amorphous and crystalline domains, i.e. a two-phase particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physical nature of partially disordered particles has been the object of considerable discussion in the literature (Bordet et al, 2016; Dujardin et al, 2013; Luisi et al, 2012; Newman and Zografi, 2014; Pazesh et al, 2017) and it has been proposed that they may be composed of crystallites surrounded by crystal defects or alternatively be composed of amorphous and crystalline domains, i.e. a two-phase particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical nature of mechanically disordered particles has been the object of considerable discussion in the literature and it is proposed (Dujardin et al, 2013; Luisi et al, 2012; Newman and Zografi, 2014) that they may be composed of crystallites surrounded by crystal defects (one-state model) or consist of amorphous and crystalline domains (two-state model) or a combination thereof. By studying lactose particles partially disordered by milling, we reported (Badal Tejedor et al, 2017) that the particles had a surface which approximated the nature of the surface of fully amorphous particles prepared by spray-drying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milling is one the most common particle size reduction step. The effect of milling parameters, such as milling frequency, impact velocity, milling time on particle bulk and surface properties, is well documented in the literature Adrjanowicz et al, 2011;Forcino et al, 2010;Vegt et al, 2009;Shariare et al, 2011;Perkins et al, 2009;Kwan et al, 2004;Kwan et al, 2003;Leleux and Williams, 2014;Newman and Zografi, 2014). Kwan et al investigated the effect of milling frequency and propensity of breakage for microcrystalline cellulose and α-lactose monohydrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even if a sample is 10% -20% amorphous, the halo may not be evident and cannot be separated completely with diffraction peaks. PXRD is useful for the detection of a small amount of crystalline, but it is difficult to obtain reliable results for samples with low amorphous content to access accurate amorphous content [167]. PXRD has been employed in investigating the crystallinity of αlactose monohydrate and comparing it to spray-dried lactose which lacks crystalline long-range order [168].…”
Section: Solid-state Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%