2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-012-0117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical cooling rate for the glass formation of ferromagnetic Fe80P13C7 alloy

Abstract: In this paper the critical cooling rate, R c , for the glass formation of Fe 80 P 13 C 7 alloy has been determined using both Uhlmann's and Barandiaran-Colmenero's method. In Uhlmann's method, all kinds of the expressions of ∆G l−s (T) and η (T) determined using the different modes and methods had been investigated. It is indicated that the R c for the glass formation of Fe 80 P 13 C 7 alloy can be estimated to be 349 K/s by Uhlmann's method based on the appropriate expressions of ∆G l−s (T) and η (T). The cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For details of the volume-averaging procedure and the form of the macroscopic volume-averaged formulations, see Beckermann and Viskanata. 57) Further exploration of aspects of the volume-averaging procedure and assumptions were made by Ganesan, Poirier, and Voller et al 49,58) Following the pioneering works highlighted above, many studies used similar or modified versions of the same continuum equations to examine a number of different solidification phenomena, including channel formation in directionally-solidified alloys, [59][60][61][62][63][64] the effect of solidification shrinkage and pore formation, [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] and the effect of transformation-induced strains. [75][76][77] Many authors have also examined the particular formulations and assumptions of the original models.…”
Section: Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details of the volume-averaging procedure and the form of the macroscopic volume-averaged formulations, see Beckermann and Viskanata. 57) Further exploration of aspects of the volume-averaging procedure and assumptions were made by Ganesan, Poirier, and Voller et al 49,58) Following the pioneering works highlighted above, many studies used similar or modified versions of the same continuum equations to examine a number of different solidification phenomena, including channel formation in directionally-solidified alloys, [59][60][61][62][63][64] the effect of solidification shrinkage and pore formation, [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] and the effect of transformation-induced strains. [75][76][77] Many authors have also examined the particular formulations and assumptions of the original models.…”
Section: Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 K s −1 (green dotted line in Figure 7). We are fully aware that R c is overestimated by the TTT representation (Xu et al, 2013). A TTT diagram has to be converted to a CCT diagram to calculate the critical cooling rate more exactly (Grange and Kiefer, 1941;Zhu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the critical cooling rate for a glass-forming material solidified from liquid state without crystallization, constructing a CCT curve instead of time-temperature-transformation (TTT) curve is more realistic [35]. Here, we used the additivity rule to relate the transformation behavior during continuous cooling with the isothermal transformation data calculated above.…”
Section: Calculation Of Time Reduced Temperature Transformation (Tmentioning
confidence: 99%