1989
DOI: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
216
0
22

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
216
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between "real group work" (collaboration) and cooperation coincide with the definitions presented by way of introduction in this paper, for instance Damon and Phelps (1989), Galton and Williamson (1992), Hammar Chiriac (2008, 2010a, and Webb and Palincsar (1996).…”
Section: Group Work In School Settingsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The differences between "real group work" (collaboration) and cooperation coincide with the definitions presented by way of introduction in this paper, for instance Damon and Phelps (1989), Galton and Williamson (1992), Hammar Chiriac (2008, 2010a, and Webb and Palincsar (1996).…”
Section: Group Work In School Settingsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…La colaboración se distingue por que el alumnado realiza la actividad de forma compartida, en el intercambio de ideas discrepantes se aprecian con claridad ideas individuales y el grado en el que se comparte la actividad es menor, en la actividad paralela el trabajo se vuelve independiente y la interacciones entre los miembros se reducen. Además de esto, los investigadores introducen las nociones de igualdad y mutualidad para referirse a la calidad de las interacciones entre los miembros de los grupos (Damon y Phelps, 1989). Se habla de un grupo "alto en mutualidad" cuando todos sus miembros contribuyen al discurso común la mayor parte del tiempo, mientras que en el caso de que uno de los compañeros domine el discurso del grupo se habla de un grupo de "baja mutualidad" (McCarthey y McMahon, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…She criticised the analytic approach based solely on linguistic characteristics of peer interactions and maintained that such an approach ignores "the fact that in face-to-face interactions, learners negotiate not only the basic topic but also their relationship" (2002, p. 120). Instead, she explored peer interactions in collaborative dialogues by drawing on the work of Damon and Phelps (1989) and using two indexes of 'equality' and 'mutuality' for distinguishing different patterns of peer interactions. Equality refers to "authority over the task or activity" (p. 127).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%