1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75803-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Period for Restoration of Normal Stereoacuity in Acute-onset Comitant Esotropia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study are in agreement with those of Ohtsuki et al, 6 who found no relationship between the time of the operation and the postoperative development of stereopsis and no differences in the proportion of patients with bifixation between groups with early and delayed operation. All of the patients in this series achieved normal stereopsis even though the operation was performed 2 to 5 years after the onset of esotropia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of this study are in agreement with those of Ohtsuki et al, 6 who found no relationship between the time of the operation and the postoperative development of stereopsis and no differences in the proportion of patients with bifixation between groups with early and delayed operation. All of the patients in this series achieved normal stereopsis even though the operation was performed 2 to 5 years after the onset of esotropia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The success rate in re-establishing good stereoscopic vision after surgery in this group of patients is high, unlike in children described as having esotropia of acute onset. 6,8,9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] However, a high percentage of high-grade stereopsis has been found in some case series. Savino and colleagues 8 reported on the 1-year follow-up of 5 patients with AACE type 2 and achieved good stereoacuity (30 00 to 60 00 ) in all their patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Patients with preexisting phoria or microtropia with subnormal binocularity might have negatively influenced the outcome. 4,12 Due to difficulties distinguishing between decompensated monofixators with microdeviations and AACE type 2, some original monofixators may have slipped in by mistake. This may also hold true for some of our patients with low-grade stereopsis or suppression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation