Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Race Theory for HCI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In computing research, studies involving racial and ethnic minorities have included the impact of mentorship, the experiences of computer science students, [19][20][21] and advanced academic careers in computer science. 22 As impactful as that work has been, there is a lack of knowledge about racial and ethnic minority experiences among fulltime software developers. Because race and ethnicity are not globally applied uniform concepts, 23 we face a question: how can we collect data about race and ethnicity within global software development in our attempt to increase the percentage of people who are not white and who thus do not have a privileged position?…”
Section: Diversity Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In computing research, studies involving racial and ethnic minorities have included the impact of mentorship, the experiences of computer science students, [19][20][21] and advanced academic careers in computer science. 22 As impactful as that work has been, there is a lack of knowledge about racial and ethnic minority experiences among fulltime software developers. Because race and ethnicity are not globally applied uniform concepts, 23 we face a question: how can we collect data about race and ethnicity within global software development in our attempt to increase the percentage of people who are not white and who thus do not have a privileged position?…”
Section: Diversity Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist HCI has had a wide impact in studies related to women's health [6,14], emancipatory design [19] and our understanding of gender and design [27,83]. It has also been extended to include intersectional concerns developed by Black feminist theorists-that is to say, design approaches that consider how experiences of oppression exist at the intersection of multiple, interlocking forces of oppression such as racism and sexism [42,73,76,81,92,93]-as well as design technologies for trans* and non-binary users [2,58].…”
Section: Feminist Hci For Minoritized People Stigmatized Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, work by Clarke and Wright [28] shows how digital stories created by survivors of domestic abuse might promote empowerment for the storytellers as well as mobilize cross-cultural understanding. Researchers have made the point that who is speaking and who is listening matters deeply-in their paper bridging critical race theory with HCI, Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al narrate their own stories of race-based oppression in order to expose how racism surfaces in the field of HCI [73]. In Michie et al's work [69], the group prototyped a platform for using personal stories in pro-choice abortion advocacy work and found that participants saw personal narratives as a way to "break the silence" in a culture that considers abortion a taboo topic.…”
Section: Hackathon Qualities That May Have Fostered Feminist Conscioumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pre-study efforts helped inform (and limit) our questionnaire design. We integrated this knowledge into previous design standards for conducting research with marginalized groups in HCI informed by Critical Race Theory (Delgado et al, 2001;Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al, 2020), Identity-Based Motivation Theory (Oyserman, 2008), historical materialist epistemologies, and phenomenological elicitation. Patricia Hill Collins (Hill Collins, 2002), Helen Cixous (Sellers, 2003), Frantz Fanon (Fanon et al, 2004), Peggy McIntosh (McIntosh, 2003, Dean Spade (Spade, 2015), and Audre Lorde (Lorde, 2012) inform the theoretical background and language used in survey to ensure a shared, preliminary understanding of stratified experiences.…”
Section: Background and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%