Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified-Chinese Version of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire for Patients in Mainland China

Zhang, Zicheng; Jia, Zheng-Yu; Cheng, Yajun; Wang, Fei; Yang, Yilin; Li, Ming; Zhou, Xin; Wei, Xianzhao

doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002869

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The NBQ has been cross-culturally translated into several languages with good internal consistency and construct validity to evaluate low back pain and NP. 24 Recently, the version of this instrument has been translated and validated in various languages such as Arabic, 25 , 26 Brazilian, 27 Turkish, 28 , 29 French, 15 Dutch, 16 German, 12 and Italian. 17 The 6-step translation and cross cultural adaptation process after Beaton et al, 14 was used in this study and included forward and back translations, validation by an expert committee, face validity and testing in NP patients followed by statistical analysis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) is being used widely in various countries. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian version of NBQ. Methods: This methodological study investigated 170 patients with chronic neck pain (NP). The psychometric properties of NBQ were evaluated in two stages. First, the standard scale was translated based on Guillemin’s guidelines for cross-cultural adaption and face validity tested in a pilot group (N=25). Second, it was conducted on a sample of 170 diverse chronic pain patients. Construct validity was determined with convergent validity by short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Then, the reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The instrument demonstrated a good face validity and the participants made minor changes. A slight change was applied on content validity. In construct validity, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.85, which was statistically significant and showed strong correlation. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 was obtained. This confirmed the remarkable internal consistency and stability (0.92). Conclusion: The Persian version of NBQ showed a good internal consistency and reliability and it could be considered as a valuable tool for assessing patients with cervical pain in Iranian population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…15 All the above scales have been translated into Chinese and have been proven to possess good reliability and validity. 10,16…”

Section: Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simplified Chinese Version of the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) for Patients with Low Back Pain

Jia

Cao

Wu³

et al. 2022

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study Design. A cross-sectional study. Objective. To translate and cross-culturally adapt back pain function scale (BPFS) into a simplified Chinese version (SC-BPFS), and evaluate the reliability and validity of SC-BPFS in patients with low back pain. Summary of Background Data. The BPFS is a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for low back pain. However, simplified Chinese version of BPFS has not been validated. Methods. Cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the internationally recognized guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcome Committee. Onehundred and sixty-two participants with low back pain (LBP) were included in this study. Reliability was tested based on testretest reliability and internal consistency. We calculated Cronbach alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was analyzed by evaluating the correlations between SC-BPFS and the Oswestry disability index (ODI), the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the short form (36) health survey (SF-36).Results. The original version of the BPFS was cross-culturally well adapted and translated into simplified Chinese. Each item of the SC-BPFS was properly responded and correlated with the total items. SC-BPFS had good reliability (Cronbach alpha ¼ 0.847, intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ¼ 0.891, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.864-0.914). Elimination of any one item in all did not result in a value of Cronbach alpha of <0.80. SC-BPFS had a high correlation with ODI (0.712, P < 0.01) and a moderate correlation with VAS (0.484, P < 0.01). And it was also fairly to very well correlated with physical domains of SF-36 (0.334-0.632, P < 0.01), and not correlated with mental domains of SF-36 (0.022-0.119, P > 0.05). Conclusion. SC-BPFS demonstrated outstanding acceptability, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity, and could be recommended for patients with LBP in Mainland China.

show abstract

“…Bu sınıflama modeline göre karmaşık bir etiyopatogenez olan boyun ağrısı için biyopsikososyal yaklaşım elzem olarak gösterilmektedir (38,40). Bournemouth Boyun Anketi'nin, kısa zamanda doldurulması, kolay ve anlaşılır yapısı, basit puanlaması (1,37) ve boyun ağrılı hastaları ağrı ve özrün yanı sıra biyopsikososyal temelde de değerlendirmesi (1,17,39), onu diğer anketlerden pozitif yönde ayrıştırmaktadır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda anketin iç tutarlılık değerinin 0,853 olduğu bulunmuştur.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Boyun ağrısı; görülme sıklığındaki yükseklik ve oluşturduğu fonksiyonel bozukluk sebebiyle küresel bir sorun haline dönüşmüştür (1). Ülkemizde ayrıntılı bir çalışma olmamakla birlikte literatürdeki çalışmalar incelendiğinde Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde nüfusun %13,3'ünün (2), Avustralya'da %30,2'sinin (3) ve İran'da ise %30'unun (4) iş yaşantılarında kronik boyun ağrısı çektiği görülmektedir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Günaydin

2020

Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toplum genelinde sıklıkla görülebilen ve bireylerde kısıtlılık tablosu oluşturabilen boyun ağrısının, değerlendirilmesi ve takibinde son durum ölçeklerinin kullanımı büyük önem arz etmektedir. Hasta temelli bu ölçeklerden biri olarak karşımıza çıkan Bournemouth Boyun Anketi, boyun ağrılı hastalarda ağrı ve özrün yanı sıra biyopsikososyal özellikleri de değerlendirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Bournemouth Boyun Anketi'nin psikometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 73 boyun ağrılı birey dâhil olmuş ve analizler için katılımcılar Bournemouth Boyun Anketi ile birlikte Boyun Özür İndeksi, Boyun Ağrısı Özürlülük Skalası ve Kısa Form 36 anketlerini doldurmuşlardır. Otuz bir katılımcı ise test-tekrar test analizi için Bournemouth Boyun Anketi'ni 48 saat sonra tekrar tamamlamıştır. Bulgular: Yapılan analizler sonucu anketin iç tutarlılık Cronbach alfa değerinin 0,853, test-tekrar test sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı değerinin ise 0,932 olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu değerler anketin yüksek bir güvenirliğe sahip olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Gerçekleştirilen Pearson korelasyon analizi sonucunda Bournemouth Boyun Anketi'nin Boyun Özür İndeksi (r=0,718) ve Boyun Ağrısı Özürlülük Skalası (r=0,763) ile çok iyi düzeyde, Kısa Form 36'nın ilgili parametreleriyle ((-0,440)-(-0,594)) ise iyi düzeyde ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Anketin bileşen sayısının belirlenmesi için yapılan açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucu anketin tek faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Bu çalışma sonucunda Bournemouth Boyun Anketi'nin yeterli psikometrik özelliklere sahip olduğu ve boyun ağrılı hastalarda kullanımının uygun olduğu bulunmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Boyun ağrısı; sağlık anketleri; faktör analizi. Investigation of Psychometric Properties of the Bournemouth Neck QuestionnaireABSTRACT Aim: The use of the outcome measurements in the evaluation and follow-up of neck pain, which can be seen frequently in society and create a table of limitations in individuals, is of great importance. The Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire, one of the patient-related questionnaires, evaluates pain and disability as well as biopsychosocial features in patients with neck pain. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric characteristics of the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire. Materials and Methods:The study included 73 subjects with neck pain and for analyses participants filled Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire with Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain Disability Scale and Short Form 36. For testretest analysis 31 participants completed the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire again after 48 hours. Results: As a result of the analyses, the internal consistency Cronbach alpha value of the questionnaire was 0.853 and the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.932. These values indicate that the questionnaire has a high level of reliability. As a result of Pearson's correlation analysis, the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire was very-good correlated with the Neck Disability Index (r=0.718) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (r=0.763) an...

show abstract

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified-Chinese Version of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire for Patients in Mainland China

Cited by 7 publications

References 27 publications

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Simplified Chinese Version of the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) for Patients with Low Back Pain

Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About