2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowd-sourcing prosodic annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, corroborating the evidence from other languages (see Baumann andWinter 2018 for German, andCole et al 2017 for English) we found that in prosodically untrained prominence perception, content words are more prominent than function words. Baumann and Winter (2018) predict a positive effect for content words based on informationstructural criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, corroborating the evidence from other languages (see Baumann andWinter 2018 for German, andCole et al 2017 for English) we found that in prosodically untrained prominence perception, content words are more prominent than function words. Baumann and Winter (2018) predict a positive effect for content words based on informationstructural criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, under high cognitive load the speakers might not be able to produce reliable cues to prominence or the presence of cues to prominence depends on the activation of concepts in speakers rather than in the ongoing discourse (for a discussion of speaker-and listener-oriented characteristics in speech production see Arnold 2008). Thus, as also suggested in Cole et al (2017), listeners of naturally occurring speech are dealing with conflicting cues, and due to this, they need to vary their strategies to resolve the conflicting cues to prominence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations