1969
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(69)80141-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of magnesium ditelluride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These positions are similar to the theoretically calculated ones for semiconducting SWCNTs with a diameter of 1.3-1.5 nm [53][54][55]. The possible chiralities of exciting nanotubes are (19,0), (18,1), (17,3), (16,5), (12,10) for 1.5-nm SWCNTs; (17,1), (16,3), (14,6), (12,8), (11,9) for 1.4-nm SWCNTs, and (17,0), (16,2), (13,6), (12,7), (10,9) for 1.34-nm SWCNTs [40,41]. The shifts of peak positions in comparison to ones of the pristine SWCNTs are given in the parentheses.…”
Section: Figures 3a and B Demonstrate The Rbm-and G-bands Ofsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These positions are similar to the theoretically calculated ones for semiconducting SWCNTs with a diameter of 1.3-1.5 nm [53][54][55]. The possible chiralities of exciting nanotubes are (19,0), (18,1), (17,3), (16,5), (12,10) for 1.5-nm SWCNTs; (17,1), (16,3), (14,6), (12,8), (11,9) for 1.4-nm SWCNTs, and (17,0), (16,2), (13,6), (12,7), (10,9) for 1.34-nm SWCNTs [40,41]. The shifts of peak positions in comparison to ones of the pristine SWCNTs are given in the parentheses.…”
Section: Figures 3a and B Demonstrate The Rbm-and G-bands Ofsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These positions are similar to the theoretically calculated ones for metallic nanotubes with a diameter of 1.4 nm [53][54][55]. The possible chiralities of exciting nanotubes are (20,1), (19,3), (17,4), (16,6), (15,8), (14,10) for 1.5-nm SWCNTs and (18,0), (17,2), (16,4), (13,7), (14,5), (10,10) for 1.4-nm SWCNTs [40,41].…”
Section: Figures 3a and B Demonstrate The Rbm-and G-bands Ofsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distances are longer than in common covalent Te–Te-bonds. For instance, in the case of [Te 2 ] 2– dumbbells, they range between 2.70 Å in MgTe 2 and 2.86 Å in α-K 2 Te 2 , while in the infinite Te-chains in elemental tellurium, d (Te–Te) is 2.83 Å . Nonetheless, the distances are much shorter than twice the van der Waals radius, which is a first indicator for covalent Te–Te interactions within the strands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 540 K, the bond length of the [Te 2 ] 2– dumbbell is 2.94 Å and the distance of the coordinating Te 2– anion to the dumbbell is 3.71 Å. The common values for [Te 2 ] 2– dumbbells at room temperature are 2.70 Å in MgTe 2 and 2.86 Å in α-K 2 Te 2 . Ag 10 Te 4 Br 3 contains the same Te 4 structure motif with Te–Te distances of 2.79 and 3.60 Å, respectively, at room temperature .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%