2017
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSR Performance and the Readability of CSR Reports: Too Good to be True?

Abstract: Using a manually collected sample of 331 corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports issued by US public companies, we examine the relationship between the CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports. We adopt three indices -Fog, Kincaid, and Flesch -to measure the readability of CSR reports and draw upon two databases -ESG and KLDto measure CSR performance from both environmental and social perspectives. The results show a significant positive relationship between CSR performance and the readability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
251
2
21

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
12
251
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…In the other CSR ranking models (Green ranking, RepTrak and Global 100), economic variables do not intervene but only sustainability ones, which is expected. Although these CSR rankings are open access, our results coincide with other works obtained for private‐access CSR (Wang et al, ), which confirms a positive and significant relation between CSR performance and transparency reports. We conclude that economic and CSR variables impact brand rankings (except Brand Finance), whereas only CSR variables impact CSR rankings (except Finance Yahoo Sustainability).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the other CSR ranking models (Green ranking, RepTrak and Global 100), economic variables do not intervene but only sustainability ones, which is expected. Although these CSR rankings are open access, our results coincide with other works obtained for private‐access CSR (Wang et al, ), which confirms a positive and significant relation between CSR performance and transparency reports. We conclude that economic and CSR variables impact brand rankings (except Brand Finance), whereas only CSR variables impact CSR rankings (except Finance Yahoo Sustainability).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…() and Wang et al . () both document a positive relationship between CSR performance and readability, suggesting that better CSR performers are likely to have CSR reports with better readability. Both studies employ the Flesch‐Kincaid grade level as one of their measures of readability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, in line with most of the previous research focused on environmental disclosure, our analysis is based on stakeholder theory (Kolk & Pinkse, ; Prado‐Lorenzo, Gallego‐Álvarez, & García‐Sánchez, ; Sarkis, González‐Torre, & Adenso‐Díaz, ; Husted & Allen, ; Lee, ; Perez‐Batres, Doh, Miller, & Pisani, ; Yamahaki, ; Montiel & Delgado‐Ceballos, ) and legitimacy theory (Ahmad & Mohamad, ; Gray et al, ; Llena, Moneva, & Hernández, ; Milne & Patten, ; Walden & Schwartz, ; Wang, Hsieh, & Sarkis, ).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%