1997
DOI: 10.1080/02841859709174381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT Measurement of Anteversion in the Femoral Neck

Abstract: CT measurement of femoral anteversion in clinical practice can only be accurate when corrected for variation in the position of the femoral shaft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy and reproducibility of FNA measurements, as described in this paper, are not as good as the 3D CT measurements (8), but they are comparable with (3,4,7,9,13,19) or better than (14,21) other measurement techniques based on conventional radiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy and reproducibility of FNA measurements, as described in this paper, are not as good as the 3D CT measurements (8), but they are comparable with (3,4,7,9,13,19) or better than (14,21) other measurement techniques based on conventional radiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The reference points are: H, the centre of the femoral head; 0, the centre of the femoral shaft at the level of the lesser trochanter; and K, the centre of the knee (2, 5, 8,16).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-operative calculations of femoral torsion, version and offset as well as acetabular version and inclination have been previously undertaken using plain radiographs [5,6], and subsequently more accurately using CT scanning [7]. The use of CT guidance in the placement of prostheses has been shown to significantly improve the post-operative component positions compared with freehand techniques [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) or multiple axial slices are generally advocated, but these methods show variable accuracy and there is no consensus as to the best approach [1][2][3][4][5]. In addition, changes in patient positioning, such as flexion and rotation at the hip, have been shown to affect anteversion measurement [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%