2019
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2019.23.2125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cubulable Kähler groups

Abstract: We prove that a Kähler group which is cubulable, i.e. which acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly on a CAT(0) cubical complex, has a finite index subgroup isomorphic to a direct product of surface groups, possibly with a free Abelian factor. Similarly, we prove that a closed aspherical Kähler manifold with a cubulable fundamental group has a finite cover which is biholomorphic to a topologically trivial principal torus bundle over a product of Riemann surfaces. Along the way, we prove a factorization r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So it would also be interesting to determine under what circumstances an invariant Rvalued cross ratio can be discretised to an invariant Z-valued cross ratio. Of course, one should be very careful when making speculations, as, for instance, uniform lattices in SU (n, 1) and Sp(n, 1) are not cubulable [27,53].…”
Section: Theorem C Let a Non-elementary Gromov Hyperbolic Group G Act Properly And Cocompactly On Essential Hyperplane-essentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it would also be interesting to determine under what circumstances an invariant Rvalued cross ratio can be discretised to an invariant Z-valued cross ratio. Of course, one should be very careful when making speculations, as, for instance, uniform lattices in SU (n, 1) and Sp(n, 1) are not cubulable [27,53].…”
Section: Theorem C Let a Non-elementary Gromov Hyperbolic Group G Act Properly And Cocompactly On Essential Hyperplane-essentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result allows us to construct free subgroups of Γ; in the case of CAT(0) cube complexes, compare with Theorem 6 in [DP16] and Theorem F in [CS11]. Note that only part (1) is needed to prove the Tits alternative; we will use part (2) in [Fio17b] to characterise Roller elementarity in terms of the vanishing of a certain cohomology class.…”
Section: Caprace-sageev Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of simplicial trees, it appears in [FV17]. For CAT(0) cube complexes, the implication "Roller nonelementary ⇒ [b] = 0" is implicit in [DP16]. In [CFI16], the authors construct a family of bounded cohomology classes detecting Roller elementarity in CAT(0) cube complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%