Cultural Participation and Individual Quality of Life: A Review of Research Findings

Abstract

Objectives: to examine the research evidence for the contribution of cultural participation to individual quality of life; to discuss the utility of different types of QOL conceptualisation and measurement for cultural policy making.Methods: a literature review of English language publications over the decade from 1995.Results: there are few extant QOL studies, and very little empirical evidence to support the claims made by policymakers about culture and individual QOL.Conclusions: The article suggests that a multi-dimensional, rather than a global, conceptualisation of QOL is best suited to the cultural policymaking context. Securing findings generalisable across all cultural forms, project types and all individuals or populations is not an achievable goal. Methodologies need to be developed and tested to understand how and why cultural participation affects individual QOL domains and these need to take into account differences in types of cultural participation, the quality of the experience, and between individuals in different social circumstances and in different life stages.

Does Cultural Capital Matter?: Cultural Divide and Quality of Life

“…As studies adopted more inclusive research designs and featured comprehensive study on various subjects, they did not execute in-depth studies exclusively on the relationship between cultural activities and the quality of life. For example, since cultural activities were partly included in leisure activities (Michalos and Zumbo 2000), or in routine activities (Kelly et al 2001), those studies could not analyze the independent and exclusive effect of cultural activities (Galloway 2006;Scottish Executive Social Research 2005). Second, the subjective factors embedded within cultural activities were not specific.…”

The Cultural Legacy of a Major Event: A Case Study of the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool

“…For many ECOC host cities, increasing participation and cultural interest is an important goal [13]. In the UK, the Ministry of Culture, Media and Sports' mission statement is "improving the quality of life for all through culture and sports events, supporting the pursuit of excellence, support for tourism, creativity and leisure" (as cited in [32], p. 324).…”

Istanbul’daki Bos Zaman Degerlendirme Mekanlarının Dagılımı Uzerine Niceliksel Bir Degerlendirme

“…Bu faydalar en genel biçimiyle fiziksel, sosyal, psikolojik, kişilik geliştirici, duygusal ve toplumsal faydalar biçiminde gruplanabilir (Karaküçük ve Gürbüz, 2007). Nadirova (2000) (Hoynes, 2003), toplumların güçlendirilmesi, sosyal uyum ve içerme, sosyal yapının yenilenmesi, yeni sosyal ağ imkanlarının sağlanması (Galloway, 2006) ve yaşam boyu öğrenme imkanlarının arttırılması ise toplumsal etkilerdir (Grodach and Sideris, 2007). Kentsel ölçekteki faydalar ise; turistlerin kente çekilmesi, kent imajı, ekonomik kalkınma, hane halklarının konut yeri tercihleri (Grodach and Sideris, 2007), kent kaynaklarının optimum kullanımı ve sermaye birikim süreçlerinin yönetimi (Grossi et.…”

“…Kentsel ölçekteki faydalar ise; turistlerin kente çekilmesi, kent imajı, ekonomik kalkınma, hane halklarının konut yeri tercihleri (Grodach and Sideris, 2007), kent kaynaklarının optimum kullanımı ve sermaye birikim süreçlerinin yönetimi (Grossi et. al., 2011), siyaset ve sivil toplum gibi yaşamın diğer alanlarına aktif katılımın arttırılması (Haynes, 2003) ve istihdam olanaklarının arttırılmasıdır (Galloway, 2006)…”