2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Effective Dose and Cancer Risk of Pediatric Population in Repetitive Whole-Body Scan Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can further increase the error of perceived and true risk of radiation dose from CT examinations. The combination of individual dose distributions and risk assessment has been presented for a few other examinations in literature, such as absorptiometry and spine radiographs, but not for spiral CT examinations 27 . Pairwise patient comparisons provide a comprehensive overview of the extent of error with regard to age, BMI and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can further increase the error of perceived and true risk of radiation dose from CT examinations. The combination of individual dose distributions and risk assessment has been presented for a few other examinations in literature, such as absorptiometry and spine radiographs, but not for spiral CT examinations 27 . Pairwise patient comparisons provide a comprehensive overview of the extent of error with regard to age, BMI and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DXA is the most frequently used method of assessment of bone mass because of its availability, diagnostic accuracy, and because of its use of a low dose of radiation (5–6 mSv for the lumbar spine, hip, and whole body) [ 42 ]. DXA measures BMC and calculates areal BMD (aBMD) by dividing BMC by the area of the region scanned.…”
Section: Paediatric Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, most of the imaging equipment has been traditionally developed and manufactured without specific indications for pediatric use. This is particularly important in relation to the use of ionizing radiation as younger patients are at greater risk of complications secondary to radiation exposure [71,72]. Modern dual energy techniques have reduced exposure but still have a quantifiable risk of cancer induction when use is frequent in the pediatric population [73].…”
Section: Diagnostic Imaging Devices For Cypmentioning
confidence: 99%