2014
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2014.946346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Health Risk Assessment: Finding New Ideas and Escaping from the Old Ones

Abstract: Cumulative risk assessment (CRA) is an emergent tool for organizing and analyzing scientific information to examine, characterize, and possibly quantify adverse health outcomes from combined effects of exposure to diverse environmental factors, including both chemical and nonchemical stressors. This article examines the implementation of effects-based CRA, which emphasizes evaluating health risks in a defined community or population, as opposed to stressor-based approaches, which focus on determining health ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, most of the approaches used in CRA chemical/non-chemical studies can be divided into three categories: effect-based (top-down), stressor-based (bottom-up) and the hybrid of these two, vulnerability-based 5,6 , which considers impacts from a number of chemical and non-chemical stressors. In practice, vulnerability-based studies utilize existing data and information, and can also effectively address the prioritized stressors without exhaustively considering all the non-chemical or chemical variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most of the approaches used in CRA chemical/non-chemical studies can be divided into three categories: effect-based (top-down), stressor-based (bottom-up) and the hybrid of these two, vulnerability-based 5,6 , which considers impacts from a number of chemical and non-chemical stressors. In practice, vulnerability-based studies utilize existing data and information, and can also effectively address the prioritized stressors without exhaustively considering all the non-chemical or chemical variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types of papers categorized as conceptual developments in CRA are summarized in Table 1 with additional details in Table S2 . These include thought pieces on cumulative risk from different disciplinary perspectives, e.g., anthropology [ 11 ], sociology [ 12 ], and health geography [ 13 ]; frameworks and approaches for conducting or designing CRAs [ 5 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], biomonitoring approaches [ 9 ], and epidemiological approaches [ 21 ]; and definitions and discussion of important concepts, including interindividual variability [ 22 ], AL [ 23 ], and psychosocial stressors [ 24 ].…”
Section: Results—human Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AL as an intermediary element in health outcomes took on a prominent role in more recent studies of cumulative risk. A number of review articles pointed to a widening evidence base for cumulative risks, and investigation of links between social and environmental stressors [ 16 , 17 , 43 , 86 , 92 ].…”
Section: Discussion: Summary Of the State Of The Practice Of Cramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to these elements, cumulative risk characterizations can also address the context of the decision the CRA is informing. For example, NRC (see also Sexton) suggests that CRAs be oriented to evaluate risk management options (notably interventions) as a way of reducing analytical complexities. For environmental health risks, the decision context might include the following questions: (1)What are the magnitudes of the risks?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%