2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additive manufacturing offers a means to produce implants with engineered porosity in the microscale range [8] , with porous titanium and tantalum implants exhibiting mechanical properties similar to cortical bone [9] and improved secondary stability in biomechanical evaluation [10] . The low mechanical stiffness [11,12] imparted by these implants offers one method to mitigate long-term bone resorption associated with stress-shielding [13] and the corresponding increase in surface area can create additional regions of bone-to-implant contact [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive manufacturing offers a means to produce implants with engineered porosity in the microscale range [8] , with porous titanium and tantalum implants exhibiting mechanical properties similar to cortical bone [9] and improved secondary stability in biomechanical evaluation [10] . The low mechanical stiffness [11,12] imparted by these implants offers one method to mitigate long-term bone resorption associated with stress-shielding [13] and the corresponding increase in surface area can create additional regions of bone-to-implant contact [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, our results suggest that both porosity and the presence of submicron topographical cues favor earlier cell proliferation and favor preliminary osteointegration processes. 37,38 Contrarily to previous studies, 54−56 the PDA coating alone did not enhance cell proliferation, suggesting that specific responses to PDA could be cell line-dependent or dependent on the underlying topography of the PDA coating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper osseointegration is also crucial in determining the applicability of a biomaterial in vivo . Porous structures, when specifically engineered for pore size, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties, can favor osseointegration by promoting cell infiltration and proliferation, and the formation of early vasculature. While porous substrates favor bone ingrowth and secondary stability of a prosthesis, the application of homogeneous coatings inside porous structures is not a trivial matter. In this study, a two-stage surface modification method was used to produce antibacterial properties on porous substrates, while maintaining cytocompatibility with osteoblast-like cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers outlined the use of 3D printing technology for the fabrication of scaffolds. [24] There are various studies reported in the literature that utilize the potential use of 3D printing technology to fabricate porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. [25][26][27] Singh et al [28] investigated the mechanical and degradation behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%