2011
DOI: 10.17487/rfc6419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Practices for Multiple-Interface Hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The completion corresponds to the instant at which the first data packet routed via the new connection is successfully acknowledged by the remote destination. The other metric of interest is the goodput, which refers to the data rate delivered to the MTs in the network [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completion corresponds to the instant at which the first data packet routed via the new connection is successfully acknowledged by the remote destination. The other metric of interest is the goodput, which refers to the data rate delivered to the MTs in the network [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network layer solutions found in [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] have to deal with a common constraint: the requirement of a modified proxy server based on Mobile IP. Experimental results show that Mobile IP solely introduces a significant amount of delay in the communication, and thus minimizes performance [22][23][24].…”
Section: Network Layer Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cost, bandwidth) [Wasserman and Seite, 2011]. Others explore techniques similar to IP aliasing to support multiple IP addresses due to the different (physical/virtual) network connections [IBM, 2001].…”
Section: Operating Systems and Server Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%