2018
DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2018-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Status and Issues for the Role of Occupational Health Physicians in Japan

Abstract: This paper reviews the circumstances, current situation, and issues for Japanese occupational health physicians and discusses future developments. The Industrial Safety and Health Act requires workplaces that regularly employ 50 or more workers to appoint one occupational health physician. Their duties have been expanded by amendments to the Act, and they now have increased authority. Under these conditions, the occupational health physicians not only comply with laws and regulations but also follow a professi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Japan, employers with less than 50 full-time staff are not obligated to appoint an occupational health physician or health supervisor or to establish a health committee. This lack of obligation means that workers in small companies often do not have occupational health services available to them [17]. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, there were marked differences among companies of different sizes in the implementation of remote work and infection control measures [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Japan, employers with less than 50 full-time staff are not obligated to appoint an occupational health physician or health supervisor or to establish a health committee. This lack of obligation means that workers in small companies often do not have occupational health services available to them [17]. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, there were marked differences among companies of different sizes in the implementation of remote work and infection control measures [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified the responses into three categories: those who worked for small (1-49), mediumsized (50-999), or large (1,000 or more) companies. This classification was made because under the Industrial Safety and Health Act, the obligation to establish an occupational health management system differs depending on the size of the worksite [17]. Furthermore, the government-provided workplace vaccination program was eligible for locations that could vaccinate at least 1,000 people [13].…”
Section: Company Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified the responses into three categories: those who worked for small (1–49), medium-sized (50–999), or large (1,000 or more) companies. This classification was made because under the Industrial Safety and Health Act, the obligation to establish an occupational health management system differs depending on the size of the worksite [ 17 ]. Furthermore, the government-provided workplace vaccination program was eligible for locations that could vaccinate at least 1,000 people [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current coverage of OHS in Malaysia remains low, with approximately one OHD per 26,756 employees (DOSH, 2018;Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2018). The prevalence of occupational diseases in Japan (0.01%) and France (0.18%) are relatively low due to their high accessibility of OHS, with one OHD per 685 employees in Japan, and one per 5,477 employees in France (Eurogip, 2018;Japan Statistics Bureau, 2018;Mori, 2018;"Number of physicians", 2018;Organization for Economic Co-operation Development, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%