2007
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0b013e3282ef81ea
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current V3 genotyping algorithms are inadequate for predicting X4 co-receptor usage in clinical isolates

Abstract: Current default implementations of co-receptor prediction algorithms are inadequate for predicting HIV X4 co-receptor usage in clinical samples, particularly those X4 phenotypes with low CXCR4 RLU signals. Significant improvements can be made to genotypic predictors, including training on clinical samples, using additional data to improve predictions and optimizing cutoffs and increasing genotype sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
100
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many brainderived HIV-1 strains have been characterized by V3 sequence rather than traditional phenotypic assays (10,42,47,56,(59)(60)(61)64). Recent studies suggest V3 sequence-based algorithms may underestimate the frequency of CXCR4 usage by R5X4 HIV-1 strains (46,48), and in fact, the reported brain-derived HIV-1 strains that have the R5X4 phenotype in HIV-1 entry assays are scored as "R5-like" viruses using these algorithms (48). Therefore, it is likely that the frequency of R5X4 HIV-1 variants in the brain has been underestimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many brainderived HIV-1 strains have been characterized by V3 sequence rather than traditional phenotypic assays (10,42,47,56,(59)(60)(61)64). Recent studies suggest V3 sequence-based algorithms may underestimate the frequency of CXCR4 usage by R5X4 HIV-1 strains (46,48), and in fact, the reported brain-derived HIV-1 strains that have the R5X4 phenotype in HIV-1 entry assays are scored as "R5-like" viruses using these algorithms (48). Therefore, it is likely that the frequency of R5X4 HIV-1 variants in the brain has been underestimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 11/25 charge rule is the simplest algorithm based on the presence of basic amino acids at positions 11 and/or 25 of the V3 loop (positions 1 and 35 are invariant cysteines that form a disulfide bond with each other, creating the intervening loop). However, the 11/25 rule lacks sensitivity in detecting X4 variants compared with phenotypic assays (9), with an Arg residue at position 25 being the least predictive. The position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) analyzes the entire V3 sequence and predicts X4 variants based on a scoring of the probability of the amino acid at each position being overrepresented among X4 sequences versus R5 sequences (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods generally are developed by fitting a model onto the respective training set, and might not perform as well in independent or unseen datasets [13]. Moreover, as previously reported [14], some of these methods were trained on clonal sequences, and may not be adequate for tropism testing in clinical isolates that are often heterogeneous and have high levels of sequence ambiguity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%