2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyber Incivility Perpetrator: The Influenced of Dissociative Anonimity, Invisibility, Asychronicity, and Dissociative Imagination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-conditioning step At this stage, the researcher reviewed several frequently used instruments, namely, the cyber incivility scale compiled by Lim and Teo (2009), the workplace incivility scale developed by Cortina et al, (2001), and the email incivility scale compiled by McCarthy et al (2019). In this study, the cyber incivility scale developed by Lim and Teo (2009) was chosen as the most appropriate measuring instrument to be studied and adapted because, first, it is the most commonly used to measure cyber incivility (Aljawarneh et al, 2020;Daniels & Thornton, 2020;Febriana & Fajrianthi, 2019;Krishnan, 2016;Lim & Teo, 2009;Park et al, 2015); second, the workplace incivility scale is an instrument to measure incivility behavior that is carried out face-to-face, while the e-mail incivility measurement instrument is developed only in the context of e-mail, and; third, in a number of studies, the cyber incivility scale was proven to be a reliable and valid measuring instrument. For example, in the study of Lim and Teo (2009), this measuring instrument has an alpha coefficient of active cyber incivility of .95, and that of passive cyber incivility of .94, meaning that this measuring instrument has good internal consistency because the Cronbach's alpha is acceptable when > .7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pre-conditioning step At this stage, the researcher reviewed several frequently used instruments, namely, the cyber incivility scale compiled by Lim and Teo (2009), the workplace incivility scale developed by Cortina et al, (2001), and the email incivility scale compiled by McCarthy et al (2019). In this study, the cyber incivility scale developed by Lim and Teo (2009) was chosen as the most appropriate measuring instrument to be studied and adapted because, first, it is the most commonly used to measure cyber incivility (Aljawarneh et al, 2020;Daniels & Thornton, 2020;Febriana & Fajrianthi, 2019;Krishnan, 2016;Lim & Teo, 2009;Park et al, 2015); second, the workplace incivility scale is an instrument to measure incivility behavior that is carried out face-to-face, while the e-mail incivility measurement instrument is developed only in the context of e-mail, and; third, in a number of studies, the cyber incivility scale was proven to be a reliable and valid measuring instrument. For example, in the study of Lim and Teo (2009), this measuring instrument has an alpha coefficient of active cyber incivility of .95, and that of passive cyber incivility of .94, meaning that this measuring instrument has good internal consistency because the Cronbach's alpha is acceptable when > .7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scientific articles have discussed cyber-initiative perpetrators, such as studies on samples of workers in India (Krishnan, 2016), Canada (Francis et al, 2015;Williams & Loughlin, 2016), Afrika (Ophoff et al, 2015), and Indonesia (Febriana & Fajrianthi, 2019;Ririh et al, 2018). However, no study has explained the scale of cyber incivility measurement in the context of the perpetrator properly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wada et al (2012), in their corresponding research work on methods used by fraudsters confirmed Ifinedo's, (2012) findings that individuals' response to a threat depends on their perception of the threat riskiness and their willingness to accept the threat. There have however been several isolated research works focusing specifically on identity flexibility, dissociative anonymity, and intermittent cyber ventures socially engineered cyber deception and theft (Danquah, Longe & Totimeh, 2012;Febriana & Fajrianthi, 2019;Suler, 2004;Koranteng, Apau, Opoku-Ware & Ekpezu, 2020). Generally, it is evident in most findings that worth of the security of users' information assets is certain, secured systems upturns users' integrity and reputation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been reinforced via various research work such as that on cyber incivility, this is a form of nonconformity conduct, often experienced by users in this period of online media technology sophistication. Research efforts have been ongoing to understand cyber incivility in order to reduce and anticipate this dangerous behaviour in its various forms (Febriana & Fajrianthi, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation