2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3176319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cybercrime Risks in a University Student Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, other variables have been flagged as potential contributors to scam susceptibility (includes but not limited to) gender, age, and status. Broadhurst et al [45] agree with these and state that besides these, other variables including the level of cybercrime awareness, IT competence, and gender are also flagged as potential contributors therein.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Also, other variables have been flagged as potential contributors to scam susceptibility (includes but not limited to) gender, age, and status. Broadhurst et al [45] agree with these and state that besides these, other variables including the level of cybercrime awareness, IT competence, and gender are also flagged as potential contributors therein.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…People with dissociative disorders often imagine someone's life brighter and better than it actually is [7,46]. Social networks are increasingly becoming a source of psychological addiction and a tool used to promote criminal activities [23,32,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect in assessing the risks of virtual reality and social media is cybercrime. Researchers point out that it is social media that often serves as a means of involving college and university students in illegal activities, as well as a method of psychological exposure to them, for example, with the aim of intimidation [32,33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For scam susceptibility, we adapt Broadhurst et al [40] grouping participants into three (3) namely: a. Generic…”
Section: Grouping the Participants/data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%