Basic Mechanisms of Solar Activity 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1481-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclical and Secular Variations of Solar Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Gleissberg cycle is not a cycle in the strict periodic sense but rather a modulation of the cycle envelope with a varying timescale of 60-120 years (e.g., Gleissberg 1971;Kuklin 1976;Ogurtsov et al 2002).…”
Section: Centennial Gleissberg Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Gleissberg cycle is not a cycle in the strict periodic sense but rather a modulation of the cycle envelope with a varying timescale of 60-120 years (e.g., Gleissberg 1971;Kuklin 1976;Ogurtsov et al 2002).…”
Section: Centennial Gleissberg Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Gleissberg cycle is not a cycle in the strict periodic sense but rather a modulation of the cycle envelope with a varying timescale of 60 -120 years (e.g., Gleissberg, 1971;Kuklin, 1976;Ogurtsov et al, 2002). This secular cycle has also been reported, using a spectral analysis of radiocarbon data as a proxy for solar activity (see Section 3), to exist on long timescales (Feynman and Gabriel, 1990;Peristykh and Damon, 2003), but the question of its phase locking and persistency/intermittency still remains open.…”
Section: Quasi-periodicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, some internal mechanism in the Sun might also amplify the effect of solar-planetary interaction. The idea that planetary motions may influence the solar activity has a very long history (Kuklin 1976) and seems to have been initiated by the astronomer Rudolf Wolf in the late 1850s (Charbonneau 2002). While energy considerations clearly show that the planets cannot be the direct cause of the solar activity, since this would lead to observable variations in the orbital parameters (Zaqarashvili 1997), it still remains an open question whether the planets can perturb the operation of the solar dynamo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%