1977
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.42.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetical Studies in the Genus <i>Phaseolus</i> Linn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The univalent is either a chromosome which altogether failed to pair at zygotene or one which paired to form a bivalent but whose two component chromosomes separated at diplotene because of the absence of chaisma formation between them, or else it is due to precocious anaphasic separation of bivalent (Sarbhoy 1977). In CT 2 , some PMCs showed open types of configurations that suggested the involvement of a sufficient length of the pairing segments, and in CT 3 , few PMCs showed closed configurations which may be the result of short pairing segments (Müller 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The univalent is either a chromosome which altogether failed to pair at zygotene or one which paired to form a bivalent but whose two component chromosomes separated at diplotene because of the absence of chaisma formation between them, or else it is due to precocious anaphasic separation of bivalent (Sarbhoy 1977). In CT 2 , some PMCs showed open types of configurations that suggested the involvement of a sufficient length of the pairing segments, and in CT 3 , few PMCs showed closed configurations which may be the result of short pairing segments (Müller 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY Federov, 1974;G ϭ Goldblatt, 1981b;G1 ϭ Goldblatt, 1984;G2 ϭ Goldblatt, 1985;G3 ϭ Goldblatt, 1988;G4 ϭ Goldblatt, 1990;G5 ϭ Goldblatt, 1991;G6 ϭ Goldblatt, 1994;L ϭ Lackey, 1979, M ϭ Moore, 1973. Tschechow and Kartaschowa, 1932 in L;Singh et al, 1971 in G4;Biswas and Dana, 1976 in G;Sarbhoy, 1977Sarbhoy, in G, 1978Sarbhoy, in G, 1978aSarbhoy, in G, 1980 in G1; Sinha and Roy, 1979 in G 1. 11 Biswas and Dana, 1976 in G; Sarbhoy, 1978Sarbhoy, in G, 1978a 22 Karpetschenko, 1925 in L;Shibata, 1962 in F;Kodakama, 1967Kodakama, in F, 1970Ayonoadu, 1974 in G1;Meshram, 1977 in G1; Sinha and Roy, 1979 in G1;Kodama et al, 1989 in G5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The chromosomes may fail to pair because of the alteration of linearity of genes due to translocation and inversion induced by mutagenic treatments so that at early prophase homologous chromosomes do not lie side by side. According to Sarbhoy (1977), the univalent is either a chromosome which altogether failed to pair at zygotene, which paired to form a bivalent, or its two-component chromosomes separated at diplotene because of the absence of chiasma formation. Alternatively, it may result from early anaphasic separation of bivalent.…”
Section: Meiotic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%