2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10327-003-0078-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytological events in tomato leaves inoculated with conidia of Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei and Oidium neolycopersici KTP-01

Abstract: Leaves of tomato and barley were inoculated with conidia of Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei race 1 (R1) or Oidium neolycopersici (KTP-01) to observe cytological responses in search of resistance to powdery mildew. Both conidia formed appressoria at similar rates on tomato or barley leaves, indicating that no resistance was expressed during the prepenetration stage of these fungi. On R1-inoculated tomato leaves, appressoria penetrated the papillae, but subsequent haustorium formation was inhibited by hypersensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis was supported by the observation of the conidia inoculated into nonhost barley leaves. Barley leaves suppress the penetration of nonpathogenic powdery mildew pathogens into epidermal cells by the formation of papillae (Mayama & Shishiyama 1978;Kita et al 1981;Tosa & Shishiyama 1984;Sameshima et al 2004). In fact, the tomato powdery mildew conidia were prevented from penetrating into barley leaves by the papillae formed at the sites of all appressorial projections (Fig 1A, B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This hypothesis was supported by the observation of the conidia inoculated into nonhost barley leaves. Barley leaves suppress the penetration of nonpathogenic powdery mildew pathogens into epidermal cells by the formation of papillae (Mayama & Shishiyama 1978;Kita et al 1981;Tosa & Shishiyama 1984;Sameshima et al 2004). In fact, the tomato powdery mildew conidia were prevented from penetrating into barley leaves by the papillae formed at the sites of all appressorial projections (Fig 1A, B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, samples were prepared for a BX-60 light microscope (BX-60 LM; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For this, samples were fixed and chlorophyll was removed in a boiling alcoholic lactophenol solution (10 mL glycerol, 10 mL phenol, 10 mL lactic acid, 10 mL distilled water and 40 mL 99.8% ethanol) for 1–2 min and then stained with 0.1% Aniline Blue (Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan) dissolved in distilled water as described previously [ 71 ]. The samples were observed under a BX-60 LM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nonhost interaction of tomato‐barley powdery mildew fungus ( B. graminis f. sp. hordei , Bgh ), it is the hypersensitive cell death rather than papillae that plays a pivotal role in arrest of fungal development, and the generation of HR is also delayed (Sameshima et al, ). Papillae, H 2 O 2 and HR play important roles in preventing the development of Bgt on nonhost pepper, although the time when H 2 O 2 production reaches the peak is much earlier in the nonhost interaction than in the host interaction (Hao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%