2021
DOI: 10.2172/1868142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis (V.6.16 User's Manual)

Abstract: The DAKOTA (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications) toolkit provides a flexible and extensible interface between simulation codes and iterative analysis methods. DAKOTA contains algorithms for optimization with gradient and nongradient-based methods; uncertainty quantification with sampling, reliability, and stochastic finite element methods; parameter estimation with nonlinear least squares methods; and sensitivity/variance analysis with design of experiments and parameter study metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reference calculations were performed in a plane wave basis in GPAW 54 with an energy cutoff of 2000 eV and a Monkhorst−Pack grid of 8 × 8 × 8 k-points. We use the DAKOTA 41 conmin-frcg DAKOTA coliny-pattern-search package as optimizers. For all cases analyzed, the optimizer converges within 100 optimization steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reference calculations were performed in a plane wave basis in GPAW 54 with an energy cutoff of 2000 eV and a Monkhorst−Pack grid of 8 × 8 × 8 k-points. We use the DAKOTA 41 conmin-frcg DAKOTA coliny-pattern-search package as optimizers. For all cases analyzed, the optimizer converges within 100 optimization steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This uncontracted basis is employed as a starting guess for the energy minimization in an atomic Hartree–Fock calculation. We use a conjugate gradient minimization , scheme to find the variational parameters { A k } that minimize the electronic energy of the atom. Subsequently, the atom parameters are reoptimized in the configuration interaction single and double (CISD) method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an appropriate initial condition is obtained by spinning up the E3SM to equilibrium, as discussed in Section 2.2. Next, after selecting T spin‐up and T final (ensuring that these values are large enough to avoid initial transients in the ensemble runs), we employ the DAKOTA library (Adams et al., 2013) to generate N random samples of the parameters { z i } from the selected parameter ranges or probability distributions (Table 2). We then create namelist files for each of our E3SM runs, corresponding to each of the N randomly selected parameter sets (for our study, the relevant namelist files are user_nl_cam, user_nl_mpaso, and user_nl_mpascice), and set off N runs of the E3SM, branching off the spun‐up initial condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our GSA is based upon random realizations of the nine parameters, randomly selected from a uniform distribution over the ranges defined by the “Min” and “Max” values given in Table 2. The sampling and associated model evaluations were managed using the DAKOTA library (Adams et al., 2013), an open‐source software package for optimization, UQ, and advanced parametric analysis. Much like the parameters themselves, the selection of the parameter ranges was guided by past analyses (Asay‐Davis et al., 2018; Qian et al., 2018; Rasch et al., 2019; Reckinger et al., 2015; Urrego‐Blanco et al., 2016, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine the relationship between various input parameters (inlet temperature and pressure, H 2 content, H 2 O content, CO content, and conduit radius) and model outputs for quantities within the conduit (gas volume fraction, exit pressure, exit velocity, and mass flow rate). The sensitivity analysis was performed using the Dakota toolkit (Adams et al., 2014), which is an open‐source software produced by Sandia National Laboratories. The software has a broad range of uses including model calibration, risk analyses, and uncertainty quantification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%