2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14040786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Analysis of Composite CFRP Tubes Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Pattern Recognition Approach

Abstract: The acoustic emission method has been adopted for detection of damage mechanisms in carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer composite tubes during the three-point bending test. The damage evolution process of the individual samples has been monitored using the acoustic emission method, which is one of the non-destructive methods. The obtained data were then subjected to a two-step technique, which combines the unsupervised pattern recognition approach utilizing the short-time frequency spectra with the boundary curve … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 34,48 ] In combination with FFT analysis, it is possible to assign the matrix cracking to class D (47 kHz), debonding to class C (135–150 kHz), delamination to class B (250 kHz) and failure associated with fibers (375 kHz fiber fracture, 435 kHz fiber pull‐out) to class A. The results are consistent with typical frequencies for CFRP laminates [ 33,37,45,77 ] as well with assigned clusters for different failures. [ 34,67 ] Since both laminates are made of same type of material, the resulting frequencies for each damage mechanisms are the same.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…[ 34,48 ] In combination with FFT analysis, it is possible to assign the matrix cracking to class D (47 kHz), debonding to class C (135–150 kHz), delamination to class B (250 kHz) and failure associated with fibers (375 kHz fiber fracture, 435 kHz fiber pull‐out) to class A. The results are consistent with typical frequencies for CFRP laminates [ 33,37,45,77 ] as well with assigned clusters for different failures. [ 34,67 ] Since both laminates are made of same type of material, the resulting frequencies for each damage mechanisms are the same.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…There are several methods of detecting damaged areas in composite materials [ 14 , 15 ]. Unlike other methods, the acoustic emission (AE) [ 16 , 17 ] method is very sensitive in detecting active cracks [ 18 ], even in the beginning of plastic deformation [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used to characterize the delamination process and provides reliable information about the onset of delamination on a microscopic as well as on a macroscopic scale [ 24 , 25 ]. The article [ 14 ] presents the stretching of carbon fibre tubes, which shows the dependence of force on time by the activity of acoustic emission as a function of time, thanks to which it was possible to determine the boundary separating signals from a broken fibre from undesirable secondary sources. The use of the acoustic emission method helped to identify damage mechanisms, such as matrix cracking, fibre cracking, decohesion, and detachment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Last but not least, research of innovative materials and components goes hand in hand with the development of modern testing methods, advantageously non-destructive ones, some of which are also of interest to the presented Special Issue. Popular methods are those based on optical systems, such as the PhotoStress and digital image correlation (DIC) methods [19], or the acoustic emission method based on transferring acoustic signals through the tested material [20]. Neutron diffraction is also among the top-level nondestructive testing methods [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%