2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/949671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Detection of Composite Plates by Lamb Wave Ultrasonic Tomography with a Sparse Hexagonal Network Using Damage Progression Trends

Abstract: Lamb wave based structural health monitoring shows a lot of potential for damage detection of composite structures. However, currently there is no agreement upon optimal network arrangement or detection algorithm. The objective of this research is to develop a sparse network that can be expanded to detect damage over a large area. To achieve this, a novel technique based on damage progression history has been developed. This technique gives an amplification factor to data along actuator-sensor paths that show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literature, the most common domains for the extraction of discriminative features for the pristine and damaged composite structures are frequency domain, time domain, time-frequency domain, impedance domain, and modal analysis domain [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The discriminative features in the aforementioned domains may be extracted either from low-frequency, high-wavelength structural vibration response, or high-frequency, low-wavelength guided waves or acoustic and ultrasonic waves [26][27][28][29]. Some examples of discriminative features extracted from low-frequency, highwavelength structural vibration response of composite structures are natural frequency, specific damping capacity, mode shape curvature, strain mode shapes, power spectral density, and shift in frequency response from a baseline [25,[30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, the most common domains for the extraction of discriminative features for the pristine and damaged composite structures are frequency domain, time domain, time-frequency domain, impedance domain, and modal analysis domain [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The discriminative features in the aforementioned domains may be extracted either from low-frequency, high-wavelength structural vibration response, or high-frequency, low-wavelength guided waves or acoustic and ultrasonic waves [26][27][28][29]. Some examples of discriminative features extracted from low-frequency, highwavelength structural vibration response of composite structures are natural frequency, specific damping capacity, mode shape curvature, strain mode shapes, power spectral density, and shift in frequency response from a baseline [25,[30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, continuous monitoring of the strain state of composites under different environmental conditions and mechanical loads, especially cyclic loads, is particularly important given that such loading is the most common cause inflicting catastrophic damage on composite structures during service. Therefore, it is crucial to develop techniques to monitor or “sense” the strain state of the composite during service and use these data in situ to predict the onset of failure [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided waves tomography showed great potential in damage imaging . Gao et al combined leave‐in‐place sensors with guided wave tomographic techniques for aircraft wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%