1996
DOI: 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00137-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage tolerance of CSM laminates subject to low velocity oblique impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the normal impact response exhibits a much higher force in comparison to that of the non-normal impact cases. Similar observations were reported in an early literature by [2] on low-velocity impact response of normal and oblique impact on composite structures with specific governing equations for the system of forces present during the normal and non-normal or oblique impact. The range of impact velocity for the series of experimental test in the study was up to 5.42 m/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, the normal impact response exhibits a much higher force in comparison to that of the non-normal impact cases. Similar observations were reported in an early literature by [2] on low-velocity impact response of normal and oblique impact on composite structures with specific governing equations for the system of forces present during the normal and non-normal or oblique impact. The range of impact velocity for the series of experimental test in the study was up to 5.42 m/s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, at 20°, evidence of significant rear surface damage was apparent as shown in Figure 7(c). These observations can be quantified using a simple geometric analysis, where the ratio of the surface area of an elliptical oblique cylinder to that of a right cylinder in which the projectile creates an elliptical entrance hole on the top surface of the target, as given in Equations (1) and (2). In this work, two cases were considered; i.e., inclination angles of 10° and 20° relative to the normal (θ: 0°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ghasemi-Nejhad and Parvizi-Majidi (1990) and Madjidi et al (1996) utilized a DWIT machine which had ability to test specimen with any angle in mounting, also they studied compressive behaviour of the specimen after impact test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%